The word Christ does mean "the anointed one" and Bennett contends that Christ was anointed with chrism, a cannabis-based oil, that caused his spiritual visions.The ancient recipe for this oil, recorded in Exodus, included over 9lb of flowering cannabis tops (known as kaneh-bosem in Hebrew), extracted into a hin (about 11 pints) of olive oil, with a variety of other herbs and spices. The mixture was used in anointing and fumigations that, significantly, allowed the priests and prophets to see and speak with Yahweh.
Well hells bells there's some definate proof. Umm, Crabs, yes it means annointed one but he was annoitted by God, some ceremony done by someone else would have been meaningless since God was the one who did the annionting. Otherwise it's strictly ceremonial and wouldn't have been needed by Jesus since he was pretty high on the chain of command. Even if he did partake in an "annointing" ceremony, it's put on the forehead and not injested. So much for his theory. Besides I thought you said he took shrooms.
There are indications that early Christians shared magic mushrooms - and the spiritual visions and ecstasies they occasioned - as their eucharistic meal. A 4th-century mosaic discovered at a basilica in Aquileia in northern Italy depicts baskets of mushrooms. Why? This wasn't a restaurant. Could the "red mushrooms" have been the ritual meal?
Coulda, shoulda ? He doesn't know either. It doesn't have anything to do with Jesus. There's also pictures of horses with wings, I guess that's proof that horses flew too.
Eating bread and sharing wine together was, and remains, at the heart of the Christian ritual. We'll never know exactly what Jesus and his disciples consumed at the Last Supper, but as they believed they were drinking the blood of Christ we must accept it was - if not actually hallucinatory - at least fortified by God.
He could also part the red sea, give sight to the blind and heal the sick, I guess that was some shroom induced hallucination too.
"Hey Peter" These are some righteous loaves man,,,,,,,pass the chips." I think right after that he said "By nightfall, one of you dudes is gonna give me up to the heat, which is totally bogus man"
Thanks for the undeniable "proof" that Jesus was a user. Now please take it over to the ddddrrruggg thread. Thanks.
I don't consider abortion any different than removing a cancerous tumor. It's just another undesireable growth. If the fetus has rights, then I should be able to take out a life insurance policy on it and claim it on my taxes.
I don't consider abortion any different than removing a cancerous tumor. It's just another undesireable growth. If the fetus has rights, then I should be able to take out a life insurance policy on it and claim it on my taxes.
you are either thoughtless or without a soul. it makes a load of sense that if taxes aren't at issue it isn't important. in other words if you can insure it or tax it it is important. you make as much sense and have as much soul as a liberal.
Mexican-Americans in Texas want to use a word other than “massacre” to describe an incident in which Mexican forces shot hundreds of Texans, burned their bodies and left the remains to vultures because it is insensitive to their ancestors, reports the New York Times.
The activists from Goliad, Texas, where more than 300 Texas rebels were killed by Mexican troops in 1836 in what has been known as the Goliad Massacre would prefer the word “execution” because the soldiers were merely carrying out orders. Benny Martinez, president of Goliad's chapter of the League of United Latin American Citizens, said Anglos in town continue to use the word because they "still hate Mexicans and using 'massacre' is a subtle way for them to express it."
What organization is more despicable and vile than the ACLU, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Public Citizen, Greenpeace, the National Abortion Rights Action League, and the National Organization for Women? The Boy Scouts of America.
Let's hope this is true and may they rot in hell if it is.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!U.S. Official: Saddam Sons Possibly Found in Iraq!!!!!!!!
MOSUL, Iraq — Saddam Hussein's sons Odai and Qusai (search) were "very likely" killed Tuesday when U.S. soldiers stormed a house in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul (search), U.S. military and Bush administration sources told Fox News.
I read a ways back about selling your children ...
and I saw a list of "bad" people (lol) the talk was around drugs and selling kids
I didn't read the whole list but I did notice Thomas Jefferson
He had sex with his slaves (the children from those encounters were born into slavery) -I don't know if he ever soldany of those children but they were kept as slaves not treated like his other "white" children.
How many times has he held REAL "Press Conferences" with REAL HOSTILE questions from the Press from which they can twist his answers to fit their agenda...???
Scotland Yard, home to some of the toughest police officers on the planet, is reaching out to London's transsexual community. Officers who have a sex change will be offered up to 12 months' paid leave, with 183 days at full pay, reports The Sunday Times.
The Metropolitan police say the idea is to show that Scotland Yard is keeping pace with the times.
Transsexuals already were riding high over the government's new Gender Recognition Bill, which allows them to alter their birth certificate to reflect their new gender, and to marry.
But one trouble spot remains when it comes to Scotland Yard's new effort: transsexual officers still may not conduct strip searches of suspects. It is illegal for officers to strip search the opposite sex -- and transsexuals remain "a bit of a quandary" in this respect, say the police.
In a Larry King interview celebrating Bob Dole's birthday Pres Clinton made comments about the situation in Iarq, his words suprised some democrats.
CLINTON: Well, I have a little different take on it, I think, than either side.
First of all, the White House said -- Mr. Fleischer said -- that on balance they probably shouldn't have put that comment in the speech. What happened, often happens. There was a disagreement between British intelligence and American intelligence. The president said it was British intelligence that said it. And then they said, well, maybe they shouldn't have put it in.
Let me tell you what I know. When I left office, there was a substantial amount of biological and chemical material unaccounted for. That is, at the end of the first Gulf War, we knew what he had. We knew what was destroyed in all the inspection processes and that was a lot. And then we bombed with the British for four days in 1998. We might have gotten it all; we might have gotten half of it; we might have gotten none of it. But we didn't know. So I thought it was prudent for the president to go to the U.N. and for the U.N. to say you got to let these inspectors in, and this time if you don't cooperate the penalty could be regime change, not just continued sanctions.
I mean, we're all more sensitive to any possible stocks of chemical and biological weapons. So there's a difference between British -- British intelligence still maintains that they think the nuclear story was true. I don't know what was true, what was false. I thought the White House did the right thing in just saying, Well, we probably shouldn't have said that. And I think we ought to focus on where we are and what the right thing to do for Iraq is now. That's what I think.
And here's where I agree as well. (strains from tying agreed with Clinton in the same sentence ;)
KING: What do you do, Mr. President, with what's put in front of you?
CLINTON: Well, here's what happens: every day the president gets a daily brief from the CIA. And then, if it's some important issue -- and believe me, you know, anything having to do with chemical, biological or nuclear weapons became much more important to everybody in the White House after September the 11 -- then they probably told the president, certainly Condoleezza Rice, that this is what the British intelligence thought. They maybe have a difference of opinion, but on balance, they decided they should leave that line in the speech.
I think the main thing I want to say to you is, people can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks...
I was suprised myself because it got even better.
CLINTON: And what I think -- again, I would say the most important thing is we should focus on what's the best way to build Iraq as a democracy? How is the president going to do that and deal with continuing problems in Afghanistan and North Korea?
We should be pulling for America on this. We should be pulling for the people of Iraq. We can have honest disagreements about where we go from here, and we have space now to discuss that in what I hope will be a nonpartisan and open way. But this State of the Union deal they decided to use the British intelligence. The president said it was British intelligence. Then they said on balance they shouldn't have done it. You know, everybody makes mistakes when they are president. I mean, you can't make as many calls as you have to make without messing up once in awhile. The thing we ought to be focused on is what is the right thing to do now. That's what I think.
"I mean, you can't make as many calls as you have to make without messing up once in awhile. The thing we ought to be focused on is what is the right thing to do now. That's what I think.
Well, that means the bombing of the Sudanese pharmaceutical plant was a necessary answer, but mistaken intelligence?
Will I read that here, from a conservative, before billions of years pass, and the sun goes supernova?
To be honest with you Rick I never looked at it that way when he said how you can't make as many calls without making a mistake. I suppose he's right. I have never been a big Clinton basher. (not for a second saying I didn't because I did) Did I like or even respct the man ? Not much, obviously. I agreed with some of his policies but not many, I just found him utterly distasteful on many levels but more importantly disagreed with most of his policies and decsions.
As far as the bombing of the Asprin factory my only critisicm would be what it has been of him in the past which is. Launching some airstrikes or cruise missles after we were attacked was inadequate resonse IMO for the threat we were dealing with. And it sent a message, the wrong one IMO which is that really seemed to be our only answer to the numerous attacks on his watch. The consequences of the terrorists actions didn't equate.
I just happen to think that maybe he has some points in regards to what's needed and putting things into context. I hate to say it but the left is not doing itself any favors right now with their current fervor or critiscm. They are free to do it all they like and part of me hopes they do, because the more they do, the more the public will be apppaled at some on the left's behavior.
Speaking of digging a hole. The BBC is headed down the tubes with the NYT only they are doing it much more rapidly than the NYT. They've had alot of stories as of late that have been discredited.
Here's the latest. My question for you is how papers verify so called "anonyomous" sources, or "high ranking officials speaking on the condition of annonymity" I mean what does the editor do or should he/she do to verify the reporter actually has a source and isn't just making quotes up ? Anyway, here's the story.
BBC admits errors on source By Tom Baldwin and Raymond Snoddy 24jul03 THE BBC has admitted that it had made "slips of the tongue" in describing its source for bitterly contested allegations about the intelligence dossier on Iraq released by the Blair Government last September. Â Â
The BBC acknowledged that a number of journalists, including defence correspondent Andrew Gilligan, made errors when claiming the stories were based on an "intelligence source" when, in fact, David Kelly, who committed suicide last Friday and has subsequently been revealed by the BBC as its source for claims the dossier was "sexed up" by Downing Street, was a Ministry of Defence consultant.
A BBC spokesman said on Tuesday: "There was some confusion about this. Although Dr Kelly had access to intelligence material, he was not a member of the intelligence services."
Richard Sambrook, the BBC's head of news who knew Dr Kelly's identity, said on June 26 that Gilligan's story came from "one senior and credible source in the intelligence services". The spokesman said: "That was a slip of the tongue."
Gilligan may also have misled parliament when he answered "yes" to questions from MPs on the foreign affairs committee about whether his source was "in the intelligence services"
I know you won't because even if Hillary is proven to have done what Flowers accuses you will ignore it completely. fold, you need to keep that little mind open. as small as it is it needs all the light it can get.
Flowers was sleeping with the woman's husband and she has the nerve to accuse Hillery of doing something to harm her reputation?
gee...nowadays you can't even sleep around with other people's spouses without someone saying you are...you know...sleeping around with other people's spouses...what's the world coming to?
as if Hillary cares if Bill is sleeping around. she didn't and she doesn't. what hillary did was done for political reasons, whether what she and Georgie Stephanopoulos and Carville did is a tort, is something else. But crabby, you don't care about that, just like fold you will defend those disgusting people no matter what they do.
It happened in 1977, by 1980, I went to Duluth and they already had tours of the mansion and grounds (I recall it being a hefty price to get in) and back then they had like 200 feet of sandy beach which was considered elite.
The article is in todays Pioneer Press paper BUT, I did not see it on Twincities.com.
here is a dream job for me---to go hunting in the archives of government bldgs and old houses...and get paid to find this stuff and figure it all out...
More hypocrisy. We certainly can't have a rubber snowmobile track or a rubber atv tire touch the ground here in MN BUT the lefty, head up their ass, enviro-wackos have no problem cutting a 30 foot swath through the trees (big hug) and then laying down an 8 foot strip of toxic materials (asphalt) for hundreds of miles across mother earth's forest floor for their precious bicycle/walking "trail".
Take a drive in the country on any winter day and tell me there's no place for snowmobiles to go. I happily share cross-country skiing trails with them.
The paltry amount of resources for bicycle trails amounts to making use of disused railroad beds. Ask the people in places like Lanesboro what that bike trail on the Root River had done for the local economy, restaurants, B & Bs.
When it comes to the chase for funds, the road construction nearly always wins. If Billings is correct, it will win again. So what are you complaining about?
I live in the country city dweller. You have no idea what goes on up here. And that is so typical from the Twin Cities. Come on up and take a look. Or couldn't you bear to see what the Gitchi-Gammi, Willard Munger or Mesaba hiking trails have done to the environment?
The so-called trails up here ARE 30 feet across AND are paved with an 8 foot strip of asphalt AND do extend for hundreds of miles and in some cases have been constructed through protected wetlands without studies or permits.
Trash talk?...No. Like I said, come on up and take a look through those liberal, environmental, Twin Cities, $200.00 gargoyles and see for yourself.
And no you won't get eaten by bears or wolves up here. And yes you can make it back to the St. Paul from here. And yes this dirt road does actually lead to pavement...Some actual questions I've been asked by people from the Twin Cities.
How is abortion a selfish act? The reasons for having one may or may not be selfish.
How? Because most are done on the basis that the mother-to-be doesn't want to change her life. Or that having a child will be expensive.
Ask women who have had to make that decision, because frankly, NO man is qualified to answer that question.
Utter crap from an utter idiot. it is a moral issue that everyone should think about.
Well hells bells there's some definate proof. Umm, Crabs, yes it means annointed one but he was annoitted by God, some ceremony done by someone else would have been meaningless since God was the one who did the annionting. Otherwise it's strictly ceremonial and wouldn't have been needed by Jesus since he was pretty high on the chain of command. Even if he did partake in an "annointing" ceremony, it's put on the forehead and not injested. So much for his theory. Besides I thought you said he took shrooms.
Coulda, shoulda ? He doesn't know either. It doesn't have anything to do with Jesus. There's also pictures of horses with wings, I guess that's proof that horses flew too.
He could also part the red sea, give sight to the blind and heal the sick, I guess that was some shroom induced hallucination too.
"Hey Peter" These are some righteous loaves man,,,,,,,pass the chips." I think right after that he said "By nightfall, one of you dudes is gonna give me up to the heat, which is totally bogus man"
Thanks for the undeniable "proof" that Jesus was a user. Now please take it over to the ddddrrruggg thread. Thanks.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,92317,00.html
no more "definate" than proof that he was the son of god. obtaining actual "undeniable proof" about Jesus isn't possible, obviously.
feel free to take Jesus off the list...the list was only to show that people who do drugs are not automatically "bad" people.
Wolvie, Jesus never made it to Rome... No Pizza, in Jerusalem.
LOL!!!! Good one Bill!
actually pizza may have been invented by the Vikings
The Minnesota Vikings??????? Even better!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SKOL VIKINGS!!!!!!!!!!!!
=)
LOL!
Great post Bill!
I don't consider abortion any different than removing a cancerous tumor. It's just another undesireable growth. If the fetus has rights, then I should be able to take out a life insurance policy on it and claim it on my taxes.
I don't consider abortion any different than removing a cancerous tumor. It's just another undesireable growth. If the fetus has rights, then I should be able to take out a life insurance policy on it and claim it on my taxes.
you are either thoughtless or without a soul. it makes a load of sense that if taxes aren't at issue it isn't important. in other words if you can insure it or tax it it is important. you make as much sense and have as much soul as a liberal.
Mexican-Americans in Texas want to use a word other than “massacre” to describe an incident in which Mexican forces shot hundreds of Texans, burned their bodies and left the remains to vultures because it is insensitive to their ancestors, reports the New York Times.
The activists from Goliad, Texas, where more than 300 Texas rebels were killed by Mexican troops in 1836 in what has been known as the Goliad Massacre would prefer the word “execution” because the soldiers were merely carrying out orders. Benny Martinez, president of Goliad's chapter of the League of United Latin American Citizens, said Anglos in town continue to use the word because they "still hate Mexicans and using 'massacre' is a subtle way for them to express it."
yeah, and ss troops in concentration camps were carrying out orders too. doesn't mean it doesn't fit the definition of massacre.
Mexican-Americans in Texas.....
Doesn't that make them Texans?
I just have no problem with abortion. It is not a money issue. If someone wants to have one, go for it.
Mexican-Americans in Texas.....
Doesn't that make them Texans?
Nah homie, that makes them Tamerexicans
LOL!!! Love it you F-in clown!
What organization is more despicable and vile than the ACLU, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Public Citizen, Greenpeace, the National Abortion Rights Action League, and the National Organization for Women? The Boy Scouts of America.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/GuestColumns/Zeiger20030721.shtml
Let's hope this is true and may they rot in hell if it is.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!U.S. Official: Saddam Sons Possibly Found in Iraq!!!!!!!!
I read a ways back about selling your children ...
and I saw a list of "bad" people (lol)
the talk was around drugs and selling kids
I didn't read the whole list but I did notice Thomas Jefferson
He had sex with his slaves (the children from those encounters were born into slavery) -I don't know if he ever soldany of those children but they were kept as slaves not treated like his other "white" children.
You've heard about it in the news, you've seen it in your e-mail --- mark those calendars
"From Postal Scams To Email Scams: We Have Come a Long Way Infant Child."
LOL
This is great.
Debate:
Attend a lively debate between Lady Mariam Abacha and Mr. Godwin Oyathelem. Topic: "The effectiveness of using all UPPERCASE characters."
Breakfast Kickoff Session:
Your choice: A hard boiled egg, or two slices of white bread and a cricket.
LOL Yeah that's pretty funny stuff Rick.
Workshop:
Grammatical errors: What's the optimal number?
In the http://it went to a different website it DID NOT have aol in the search name. I sent it to AOL.
How many times has he held REAL "Press Conferences" with REAL HOSTILE questions from the Press from which they can twist his answers to fit their agenda...???
Scotland Yard, home to some of the toughest police officers on the planet, is reaching out to London's transsexual community. Officers who have a sex change will be offered up to 12 months' paid leave, with 183 days at full pay, reports The Sunday Times.
The Metropolitan police say the idea is to show that Scotland Yard is keeping pace with the times.
Transsexuals already were riding high over the government's new Gender Recognition Bill, which allows them to alter their birth certificate to reflect their new gender, and to marry.
But one trouble spot remains when it comes to Scotland Yard's new effort: transsexual officers still may not conduct strip searches of suspects. It is illegal for officers to strip search the opposite sex -- and transsexuals remain "a bit of a quandary" in this respect, say the police.
President Clinton gets it.
In a Larry King interview celebrating Bob Dole's birthday Pres Clinton made comments about the situation in Iarq, his words suprised some democrats.
And here's where I agree as well. (strains from tying agreed with Clinton in the same sentence ;)
I was suprised myself because it got even better.
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0307/22/lkl.00.html
Now if the rest of his party figures that out it might be a close race in Nov.
"I mean, you can't make as many calls as you have to make without messing up once in awhile. The thing we ought to be focused on is what is the right thing to do now. That's what I think.
Well, that means the bombing of the Sudanese pharmaceutical plant was a necessary answer, but mistaken intelligence?
Will I read that here, from a conservative, before billions of years pass, and the sun goes supernova?
Rick 7/23/03 5:31pm
To be honest with you Rick I never looked at it that way when he said how you can't make as many calls without making a mistake. I suppose he's right. I have never been a big Clinton basher. (not for a second saying I didn't because I did) Did I like or even respct the man ? Not much, obviously. I agreed with some of his policies but not many, I just found him utterly distasteful on many levels but more importantly disagreed with most of his policies and decsions.
As far as the bombing of the Asprin factory my only critisicm would be what it has been of him in the past which is. Launching some airstrikes or cruise missles after we were attacked was inadequate resonse IMO for the threat we were dealing with. And it sent a message, the wrong one IMO which is that really seemed to be our only answer to the numerous attacks on his watch. The consequences of the terrorists actions didn't equate.
I just happen to think that maybe he has some points in regards to what's needed and putting things into context. I hate to say it but the left is not doing itself any favors right now with their current fervor or critiscm. They are free to do it all they like and part of me hopes they do, because the more they do, the more the public will be apppaled at some on the left's behavior.
Rick,
Speaking of digging a hole. The BBC is headed down the tubes with the NYT only they are doing it much more rapidly than the NYT. They've had alot of stories as of late that have been discredited.
Here's the latest. My question for you is how papers verify so called "anonyomous" sources, or "high ranking officials speaking on the condition of annonymity" I mean what does the editor do or should he/she do to verify the reporter actually has a source and isn't just making quotes up ? Anyway, here's the story.
http://www.thecouriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,6799907%5E401,00.html
Flowers' Conspiracy Lawsuit Against Sen. Clinton to Proceed
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,92792,00.html
Hillary didn't screw Flowers, and no further political-hay can be derived from any stories about the man or the Flowers case.
I suppose we will see about that.
Eeeeeew!
Someone scratch my eyes out.
I suppose YOU will.
I know you won't because even if Hillary is proven to have done what Flowers accuses you will ignore it completely. fold, you need to keep that little mind open. as small as it is it needs all the light it can get.
Flowers was sleeping with the woman's husband and she has the nerve to accuse Hillery of doing something to harm her reputation?
gee...nowadays you can't even sleep around with other people's spouses without someone saying you are...you know...sleeping around with other people's spouses...what's the world coming to?
Good point, Crabby.
YUP!
as if Hillary cares if Bill is sleeping around. she didn't and she doesn't. what hillary did was done for political reasons, whether what she and Georgie Stephanopoulos and Carville did is a tort, is something else. But crabby, you don't care about that, just like fold you will defend those disgusting people no matter what they do.
Glensheen Mansion murders...
It happened in 1977, by 1980, I went to Duluth and they already had tours of the mansion and grounds (I recall it being a hefty price to get in) and back then they had like 200 feet of sandy beach which was considered elite.
The article is in todays Pioneer Press paper BUT, I did not see it on Twincities.com.
here is a dream job for me---to go hunting in the archives of government bldgs and old houses...and get paid to find this stuff and figure it all out...
http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/6379074.htm
My dream job is Riverboat Gambler.
Black suit, black hat. Bolo tie with a rattlesnake clasp. Clint Eastwood style cigar. Lucky pair of graveyard boots.
Man, I'd be lookin' good as I sidled up to the poker table.
But aren't many riverboats anymore.
He gambled HIS millions..So what.
Highways win. Walking's for wimps
More hypocrisy. We certainly can't have a rubber snowmobile track or a rubber atv tire touch the ground here in MN BUT the lefty, head up their ass, enviro-wackos have no problem cutting a 30 foot swath through the trees (big hug) and then laying down an 8 foot strip of toxic materials (asphalt) for hundreds of miles across mother earth's forest floor for their precious bicycle/walking "trail".
It just never ends with these people.
Take a drive in the country on any winter day and tell me there's no place for snowmobiles to go. I happily share cross-country skiing trails with them.
The paltry amount of resources for bicycle trails amounts to making use of disused railroad beds. Ask the people in places like Lanesboro what that bike trail on the Root River had done for the local economy, restaurants, B & Bs.
When it comes to the chase for funds, the road construction nearly always wins. If Billings is correct, it will win again. So what are you complaining about?
Can you do something besides talk trash, torpedo?
I live in the country city dweller. You have no idea what goes on up here. And that is so typical from the Twin Cities. Come on up and take a look. Or couldn't you bear to see what the Gitchi-Gammi, Willard Munger or Mesaba hiking trails have done to the environment?
The so-called trails up here ARE 30 feet across AND are paved with an 8 foot strip of asphalt AND do extend for hundreds of miles and in some cases have been constructed through protected wetlands without studies or permits.
Trash talk?...No. Like I said, come on up and take a look through those liberal, environmental, Twin Cities, $200.00 gargoyles and see for yourself.
And no you won't get eaten by bears or wolves up here. And yes you can make it back to the St. Paul from here. And yes this dirt road does actually lead to pavement...Some actual questions I've been asked by people from the Twin Cities.
'Hunting Bambi' safari was a hoax
You don't know where I've been or what I've done, torpedo, so don't give me that.
More trash talk.
so, are you an erviro-wacko or not?
It seems to me torpedo is less concerned about the the trails themselves, than the type of people who use them. Or where those people live.