It is amazing that liberals think that conservatives have to disprove insane conspiracy theories. It makes more sense for those that think that beleive in insane conspiracy theories to prove that they are true.
"I just know" doesn't carry much weight in an argument...not even with a 5 year old.
say why it's crap.
do you deny the 24 minute response to a hijacking or what?
if you disagree, what exactly it is you disagree with.
It is amazing that liberals think that conservatives have to disprove insane conspiracy theories. It makes more sense for those that think that beleive in insane conspiracy theories to prove that they are true.
so, you still believe that Oswald was a lone gunman?
that Nixon did nothing wrong or illegal?
that Reagan's people didn't conduct an illegal war out of the White House basement?
that Strom never fathered a black baby? (and speaking of black babies, how much time did you spend trying to make people disprove that Clinton had one?)
so, you still believe that Oswald was a lone gunman?
Yes I do. I have only seen crack pot conspiracy theories that say otherwise. Nothing that makes sense and nothing based on evidence.
that Nixon did nothing wrong or illegal? Yeah he committed some crimes. What is your point.
that Reagan's people didn't conduct an illegal war out of the White House basement? A war to defend America.
that Strom never fathered a black baby? (and speaking of black babies, how much time did you spend trying to make people disprove that Clinton had one?) There you go bringing up Clinton again. As for Strom's child being black, was she? I mean Strom was white.
Yes I do. I have only seen crack pot conspiracy theories that say otherwise. Nothing that makes sense and nothing based on evidence.
the crazy conspiracy theory is the one that says it's even possible for him to have done it alone....the logical theory is the one you call a conspiracy.
Yeah he committed some crimes. What is your point.
before they it was exposed, was Nixon being a criminal a fact or a conspiracy theory?
A war to defend America.
an illegal war conducted covertly.
and how did running guns and drugs to thugs in another country defend us?
how did making deals with terrorists of arms for hostages defend us?
As for Strom's child being black, was she? I mean Strom was white.
she didn't exist...to have suggested to you that it was otherwise would have been a conspiracy theory.
so just who is that woman who's Strom's lawyers are saying is his illegitimate child?
the crazy conspiracy theory is the one that says it's even possible for him to have done it alone....the logical theory is the one you call a conspiracy.
You don't give a damn about what the evidence shows, do you?
Yeah he committed some crimes. What is your point. before they it was exposed, was Nixon being a criminal a fact or a conspiracy theory?
I get it. All conspiracy theories are true they just haven't been proven yet. Keep up the good work, crabs. You do more for the conservative agenda than any conservative ever could. You and Howard Dean, Godsends I tell ya.
You have been duped, crabs. That doesn't surprise me. Oswald killed Kennedy. Whether it was on his own or if he was directed by the KGB or Castro is irrelevant. The only shots fired in Deley Plaza were fired by Oswald.
ST. LOUIS — Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton apologized for joking that Mahatma Gandhi used to run a gas station in St. Louis, saying it was "a lame attempt at humor."
AUSTIN — A three-judge federal panel Tuesday upheld a new congressional map for Texas that the Republicans pushed through the Legislature after months of turmoil and two walkouts by the Democrats.
The Bush Administration went to court to argue that an Iraqi monetary judgment won by American servicemen held and tortured during the first Gulf War should be withheld and instead be used for the rebuilding of Iraq.
Despite widespread outcry, the Bush Administration is attempting to close nineteen commissaries and fifty-eight schools for the children of military personnel across the country.
Even with billions of dollars in funds being provided by Congress for our armed forces, many in the military and National Guard are being seriously under supplied and forced to provide their own protective and basic gear.
tarak posted: Even with billions of dollars in funds being provided by Congress for our armed forces, many in the military and National Guard are being seriously under supplied and forced to provide their own protective and basic gear.
If you had actually read the article then you would have known that the man at the center of the piece wanted better equipment than that issued. The army is supplying the troops. I guess the question is whether the equipoment is suitable or not. That question was not addressed by the article at all.
I also heard this story on broadcast news, and the issue is whether soldiers have basic supplies. My own comment is that if the soldiers are being undersupplied, then where is the tax money that was supposed to buy the supplies? That question wasn't addressed by you at all.
Tarka, if you actually had read the article on schools for the children of military personel you would have read:
Officials could decide to transfer operational control of some or all schools to local public districts — or simply keep the status quo. Tafoya said any changes would take at least three or four years to implement.
So the issue is not whether the children will get an education but what government unit will be rseponsible. Now crabs should be all for turning over the military schools to the locals.
The Bush Administration is spending $3 billion to set up a secret police force in Iraq, which will include ex-members of Saddam Hussein's own intelligence force.
I also heard this story on broadcast news, and the issue is whether soldiers have basic supplies. Like I said you need to read your own links.My own comment is that if the soldiers are being undersupplied, then where is the tax money that was supposed to buy the supplies? Again read the link.That question wasn't addressed by you at all. Man you are dense. The article said that the soldiers were getting boots but that the soldiers in the field recommended something different.
National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice is attempting to see that her testimony to the federal commission on the events surrounding the 9/11 attacks is given without her being required to take the standard oath that she will testify truthfully.
you are...thanks for the confirmation
This is the kind of thing that liberals believe: http://bushflash.com/buddy.html
It is pure crap. No wonder they are going down the toilet.
so, can you be specific...which parts of it wasn't true?
the 24 minutes or the buddy buddy with George Tenet or the $100,000 payment or what exactly.
do just say it's crap...explain why you think it's crap.
if you can't explain why, then your response is what is crap.
I know crap when I see it. That is how I know about you, crabs.
It is amazing that liberals think that conservatives have to disprove insane conspiracy theories. It makes more sense for those that think that beleive in insane conspiracy theories to prove that they are true.
so, you just can't explain why it's crap...
I see
"I just know" doesn't carry much weight in an argument...not even with a 5 year old.
say why it's crap.
do you deny the 24 minute response to a hijacking or what?
if you disagree, what exactly it is you disagree with.
so, you still believe that Oswald was a lone gunman?
that Nixon did nothing wrong or illegal?
that Reagan's people didn't conduct an illegal war out of the White House basement?
that Strom never fathered a black baby? (and speaking of black babies, how much time did you spend trying to make people disprove that Clinton had one?)
so, you still believe that Oswald was a lone gunman?
Yes I do. I have only seen crack pot conspiracy theories that say otherwise. Nothing that makes sense and nothing based on evidence.
that Nixon did nothing wrong or illegal? Yeah he committed some crimes. What is your point.
that Reagan's people didn't conduct an illegal war out of the White House basement? A war to defend America.
that Strom never fathered a black baby? (and speaking of black babies, how much time did you spend trying to make people disprove that Clinton had one?) There you go bringing up Clinton again. As for Strom's child being black, was she? I mean Strom was white.
the crazy conspiracy theory is the one that says it's even possible for him to have done it alone....the logical theory is the one you call a conspiracy.
before they it was exposed, was Nixon being a criminal a fact or a conspiracy theory?
an illegal war conducted covertly.
and how did running guns and drugs to thugs in another country defend us?
how did making deals with terrorists of arms for hostages defend us?
she didn't exist...to have suggested to you that it was otherwise would have been a conspiracy theory.
so just who is that woman who's Strom's lawyers are saying is his illegitimate child?
the crazy conspiracy theory is the one that says it's even possible for him to have done it alone....the logical theory is the one you call a conspiracy.
You don't give a damn about what the evidence shows, do you?
Yeah he committed some crimes. What is your point. before they it was exposed, was Nixon being a criminal a fact or a conspiracy theory?
I get it. All conspiracy theories are true they just haven't been proven yet. Keep up the good work, crabs. You do more for the conservative agenda than any conservative ever could. You and Howard Dean, Godsends I tell ya.
I've look quite extensively at the evidence...and it doesn't add up.
what it does suggest is that the one gun theory is a wild conspiracy theory.
again, I never said all, you got there all by yourself. you have to actually look at them first.
I've look quite extensively at the evidence...and it doesn't add up.
I know this a dumb question because it is obvious you are not good at math, but what doesn't add up, crabs?
what it does suggest is that the one gun theory is a wild conspiracy theory.
Nonsense.
the entry and exit wounds don't add up, for starters.
You have been duped, crabs. That doesn't surprise me. Oswald killed Kennedy. Whether it was on his own or if he was directed by the KGB or Castro is irrelevant. The only shots fired in Deley Plaza were fired by Oswald.
like I said...this is a wild conspiracy theory.
It is a well known fact that the grassy knoll was all part of the Matrix.
crabs, are you so obsessed with the grassy knoll because of the grass?
are you so obsessed with you anus because of the dingleberries?
should have expected any less crudity from crabs?
you see the crudeness and miss the message.
I'm not surprised.
you had no message, crabs, just an insult.
like I said...you missed it entirely
crabs, you make no sense. I am sure you think you have made sense but you failed. Maybe you should ask someone else if they understood your "message."
I understood it...crabs is a certified idiot.
"Quit stalking me" - Torpedo-8
ST. LOUIS — Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton apologized for joking that Mahatma Gandhi used to run a gas station in St. Louis, saying it was "a lame attempt at humor."
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,107536,00.html
Heck, it's in a lot better taste than GW's "trifecta" line that he's used over and over again . . .
Besides, jethro, when did you become a convert to the cause of political correctness?
Did you notice the site? Fox News. They report you decide. You didn't get any comment from me, either.
That's a really tiresome line of crap, jethro.
At least she didn't call him a "fucking Indian bastard". I guess she saves that slur for the Jews.
tiresome load of crap, pieter? I think not. What is a tiresome load of crap is closed minded liberals such as yourself.
AUSTIN — A three-judge federal panel Tuesday upheld a new congressional map for Texas that the Republicans pushed through the Legislature after months of turmoil and two walkouts by the Democrats.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,107540,00.html
Troops partially disabled in Iraq are having to fight to receive benefits.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/12/18/eveningnews/main589380.shtml
The Bush Administration went to court to argue that an Iraqi monetary judgment won by American servicemen held and tortured during the first Gulf War should be withheld and instead be used for the rebuilding of Iraq.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/10/international/middleeast/10POWS.html
http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-2386496.php
(This message not displayed because Taraka Das is on your Discussion Area Ignore List. To change your ignore lists go to Preferences.)
Even with billions of dollars in funds being provided by Congress for our armed forces, many in the military and National Guard are being seriously under supplied and forced to provide their own protective and basic gear.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A33341-2003Dec3.html
http://www.komotv.com/stories/28230.htm
Jethro can't handle the truth. He would rather stick his head in the sand than acknowledge that Bush is screwing up everything he touches.
You wouldn't know the truth if it bit you in your fat ass, Taraka.
that "ignore" deal sure went away fast
tarak posted: Even with billions of dollars in funds being provided by Congress for our armed forces, many in the military and National Guard are being seriously under supplied and forced to provide their own protective and basic gear.
If you had actually read the article then you would have known that the man at the center of the piece wanted better equipment than that issued. The army is supplying the troops. I guess the question is whether the equipoment is suitable or not. That question was not addressed by the article at all.
that "ignore" deal sure went away fast
It was a joke, nitwit.
that you want to ignore what is being posted is indeed a joke
Am I ignoring it, nitwit?
jethro bodine 1/7/04 6:48am
I also heard this story on broadcast news, and the issue is whether soldiers have basic supplies. My own comment is that if the soldiers are being undersupplied, then where is the tax money that was supposed to buy the supplies? That question wasn't addressed by you at all.
Tarka, if you actually had read the article on schools for the children of military personel you would have read:
So the issue is not whether the children will get an education but what government unit will be rseponsible. Now crabs should be all for turning over the military schools to the locals.
The Bush Administration is spending $3 billion to set up a secret police force in Iraq, which will include ex-members of Saddam Hussein's own intelligence force.
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/01/04/1073151210964.html
I also heard this story on broadcast news, and the issue is whether soldiers have basic supplies. Like I said you need to read your own links.My own comment is that if the soldiers are being undersupplied, then where is the tax money that was supposed to buy the supplies? Again read the link.That question wasn't addressed by you at all. Man you are dense. The article said that the soldiers were getting boots but that the soldiers in the field recommended something different.
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,565974,00.html
Your link at post #5158 is half baked, Taraka. My question to you is will you believe anything that is negative about the Bush Administration?
yes