Skip to main content

General Politics

Submitted by THX 1138 on
Forums

Political discussion

THX 1138



My theory is based on the fact that it looks like the type of virus that was designed.

Balderdash. You been talking to Art Bell or something?

Yours is based on the theory that it just sorta happened by chance.

It wasn't chance, but I like Jethro's response. The fact of the matter is, the AIDS virus is found in monkeys, but it's not fatal to them. My only conclusion is that humans somehow contracted it from them. I don't even want to know how, but nothing would surprise me.

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 4:19 PM Permalink
Rick Lundstrom

I think disease can transfer from one creature to another in ways that aren't what you're considering. You don't need to assume deviant origins unless -- for reasons that are your own -- you choose to.

Monkeys are cooked and eaten in some parts of Africa.

[Edited 3 times. Most recently by on Sep 27, 2004 at 04:35pm.]

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 4:31 PM Permalink
Grandpa Dan Zachary

Monkeys are cooked and eaten in some parts of Africa.

If they were undercooked or even raw, could this be a possibility?

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 4:48 PM Permalink
Luv2Fly

(insert Homer voice) Mmmmm, Moonnnkeeeys.

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 4:53 PM Permalink
KITCH

One theory of the origin of AIDS is that it developed from contaminated vaccines used in the world's first mass immunisation for polio. There are a number of reasons why this theory is plausible enough to be worthy of further investigation.



  • The location coincides dramatically. The earliest known cases of AIDS occurred in central Africa, in the same regions where Koprowski's polio vaccine was given to over a million people in 1957-1960.

  • The timing coincides. There is no documented case of HIV infection or AIDS before 1959. Centuries of the slave trade and European exploitation of Africa exposed Africans and others to all other diseases then known; it is implausible that HIV could have been present and spreading in Africa without being recognised.


  • Polio vaccines are grown (cultured) on monkey kidneyswhich could have been contaminated by SIVs. Polio vaccines could not be screened for SIV contamination before 1985.


  • Another monkey virus, SV-40, is known to have been passed to humans through polio vaccines. A specific pool of Koprowski's vaccine was later shown to have been contaminated by an unknown virus.

  • In order for a virus to infect a different species, it is helpful to reduce the resistance of the new host's immune system. Koprowski's polio vaccine was given to many children less than one month old, before their immune systems were fully developed. Indeed, in one trial, infants were given 15 times the standard dose in order to ensure effective immunisation.

http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/dissent/documents/AIDS/

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 5:02 PM Permalink
Luv2Fly

All I know is, monkeys give me the creeps. Ever since the Wizzard of Oz and "Outbreak". Curious George is o.k though.  

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 5:08 PM Permalink
crabgrass

How can you discount things happening by chance? I mean my God man, that is your basis for the creation of the world.

No, it's not my basis for anything... actually.

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 5:23 PM Permalink
Rick Lundstrom

"If they were undercooked or even raw, could this be a possibility?"

I think so. But that's not deviant, that's a diet that's not uncommon in some parts of the world.

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 5:29 PM Permalink
Rick Lundstrom

"All I know is, monkeys give me the creeps. Ever since the Wizzard of Oz" and "Outbreak".'

That's peculiar to me. I always saw them as pretty fascinating animals.

[Edited 2 times. Most recently by on Sep 27, 2004 at 05:34pm.]

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 5:30 PM Permalink
Luv2Fly

I don't have an irrational fear of them. Some of them are pretty cool some just are creepy. Now snakes, I do have an irrational fear of them I hate the damn things worse than Indiana Jones ever did.

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 5:36 PM Permalink
Rick Lundstrom

Saw a large gopher snake when I was out fishing this summer. I don't care for them, either.

I don't like bats.

[Edited 3 times. Most recently by on Sep 27, 2004 at 05:54pm.]

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 5:52 PM Permalink
Grandpa Dan Zachary

But that's not deviant

I wasn't trying to imply that it was. Just adding to the possibilities of how it got started.

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 7:11 PM Permalink
THX 1138


Monkeys are cooked and eaten in some parts of Africa.

Maybe it isn't deviant behaviour. Cooking them however will kill the virus. Now if they ate them raw....

Eeeew.


[Edited by on Sep 27, 2004 at 07:17pm.]

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 7:17 PM Permalink
THX 1138


BTW: The reason I mentioned the deviant behavior is because that's what Zappa suggested was so absurd.

Although absurd, I don't find it outside of the realm of possibility.

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 7:19 PM Permalink
Luv2Fly

I had a McMonkey value meal today, (it's number 8 on the menu) shouldn't have super sized it got heartburn somethin' fierce now.

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 7:20 PM Permalink
Rick Lundstrom

McDonald's doesn't supersize any more.

They said they ended it because they were running out of room on the keypad.

How lame is that! People who ordered it were turning into blimps.

[Edited by on Sep 27, 2004 at 07:24pm.]

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 7:23 PM Permalink
THX 1138



People around the world eat all sorts of things we would find weird.

Many Koreans can't understand how we can have dogs as pets living in our houses.

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 7:25 PM Permalink
Rick Lundstrom

I ate jellyfish a couple weeks ago in Shanghai.

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 7:26 PM Permalink
Luv2Fly

I don't even want to know what I ate in Japan or Korea. I learned not to ask. It tasted better that way.

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 7:27 PM Permalink
pieter b

I ate jellyfish last weekend in Los Angeles.

Seriously, though, the most likely route for a mutant SIV to have entered the human population is through monkey blood getting into cuts, sores and orifices such as the eyes and nose while infected monkeys were being gutted and dismembered for cooking. Bites are another possibility.

The germ warfare theory is a bit farfetched due to the fact that HIV is the first known transmissible retrovirus, and it takes far too long to render an infected person disabled. What you'd want in an ideal germ warfare agent is something that knocks people down quickly for a few days, doesn't kill a lot of 'em, and that you can immunize your own forces against. A 72-hour vomiting/diarrhea disorder would be perfect. Move in, take over, and have a labor force in place, without the public-health problems of bunches of dead bodies lying about.

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 8:18 PM Permalink
crabgrass

The germ warfare theory is a bit farfetched due to the fact that HIV is the first known transmissible retrovirus

You go fucking around with viruses, you never know what you might get.

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 8:20 PM Permalink
pieter b

Crabby, there's a huge difference between viruses and retroviruses. The first human-infecting retrovirus was discovered in 1981 -- making it highly unlikely that evil germ warfare scientists were fooling around with them prior to that date.

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 10:23 PM Permalink
crabgrass

The first human-infecting retrovirus was discovered in 1981

Like they are gonna tell us what they are doing.

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 10:29 PM Permalink
crabgrass

Although other animal retroviruses were discovered that invariably were linked to animal malignancies.. the birth of human retrovirol. ogy was stalled for more than 70 years as scientists through. out the world unsuccessfully searched for evidence of retroviral infections within the human population. That search was culminated in the late 1970s at the National Cancer Institute, where a team of scientists including Drs. Bernard Poiesz, Francis Ruscetti, and Robert Gallo, isolated and characterized the firs human retrovirus and linked it to human malignancy. It was initially referred to as the human T-cell leukemia virus, but now it is named the human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I HTLV-I). Within a year, a second human retrovirus HTLV-II), also linked to a human malignancy, was reported by the same research team. Approximately five years later, the "AIDS" virus, which causes an immunodeficiency, became the third human retrovirus discovered.

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1189/is_n5_v261/ai_7668153

Mon, 09/27/2004 - 10:33 PM Permalink
KITCH

I don't even want to know what I ate in Japan or Korea. I learned not to ask. It tasted better that way.


 

I'm wondering if you ate some raw or uncooked monkey???

Tue, 09/28/2004 - 6:08 AM Permalink
Luv2Fly

I don't want to know, for the same reason I don't ask what's in a hot dog. You're better off not knowing.

Tue, 09/28/2004 - 8:27 AM Permalink
pieter b

Gallo published the first article about HTLV-1 in 1981.

It's a long way from knowing that retroviruses can infect humans to custom-making one, and the oldest sample of human blood with HIV detected in it dates to 1959. Must have been the CIA's time machine. You know, the one they don't tell us about.

Tue, 09/28/2004 - 9:42 AM Permalink
Luv2Fly


Now, speaking of Monkees... I wonder how that Quadraped GDubbyawill do tonight, in the first of these so-called "DEBATES"...?


Well at least the quadraped monkey probably knows the debates are tomorrow and not tonight. :)

Wed, 09/29/2004 - 8:25 AM Permalink
Rick Lundstrom

Someone hasn't been updating their Franklin Planner.

Wed, 09/29/2004 - 8:33 AM Permalink
Luv2Fly

Well don't look now but the retarded quadraped simeon is in the lead :)

Wed, 09/29/2004 - 8:56 AM Permalink
Luv2Fly

Yet he's still beating Kerry.

Wed, 09/29/2004 - 9:08 AM Permalink
Luv2Fly

lookout. Sky is falling. I'm sure by the time Bush gets done with it, this place will look like Ethiopia.

Wed, 09/29/2004 - 9:23 AM Permalink
jethro bodine

Those in Europe, and on a limited basis elsewhere, who have undertaken such experiments, have found that granting same-sex partnerships the status of marriage is not strengthening the institution of marriage nor improving children's chances of growing up with a married mother and father. Either way, the Heritage research came at it from the other angle. What good comes from standing up for the traditional family? What makes it worth defending?

 http://www.townhall.com/columnists/rebeccahagelin/rh20040930.shtml

Thu, 09/30/2004 - 11:18 AM Permalink
jethro bodine

BAGHDAD, Iraq Â— A series of bombs killed 35 children and seven adults Thursday as U.S. troops handed out candy at a government ceremony to inaugurate a new sewage treatment plant. 

 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,134041,00.html

I see where the terrorists were out campaigning for Kerry again.

Thu, 09/30/2004 - 1:52 PM Permalink
Rick Lundstrom

Below the belt, jethro, but that's the way conservatives are getting in this campaign.

Thu, 09/30/2004 - 4:36 PM Permalink
jethro bodine

Below the belt, jethro, but that's the way conservatives are getting in this campaign

Liberals have not just been hitting below the belt but blatantly lying about Bush for the past 4 years.

Fri, 10/01/2004 - 8:40 AM Permalink
Torpedo-8

I can't wait for Foldo to cap himself after Bush wins.

Sat, 10/02/2004 - 7:43 AM Permalink
Wolvie

WASHINGTON – Along with their ballots for president, Colorado voters will decide on Nov. 2 whether to try an electoral experiment that grew out of the 2000 Florida debacle and could end up sending a new post-election case rocketing to the Supreme Court.

If the ballot initiative passes, Colorado will change the way it awards its nine Electoral College votes for president. The electoral votes would be apportioned according to the popular vote instead of all going to the candidate who comes in first.

New State Elections

Any thoughts on this? For now I am against it. Mostly because the electorial college was put in place to stop mob rule.

Mon, 10/04/2004 - 3:42 PM Permalink
jethro bodine

Backed-off or not, he was right.


No he wasn't.

Tue, 10/05/2004 - 7:09 AM Permalink
Rick Lundstrom

"But Bush held only a three-point advantage among all registered voters, down from seven points in a Post-ABC News survey conducted before the debate."

He frittered away a 90 percent approval rating. An incumbent president who has raised mountains of money, in time of war, is wthin the margin of error.

Bush should be kicking ass.

Tue, 10/05/2004 - 7:55 AM Permalink
Luv2Fly

Bush should be kicking ass.

Tue, 10/05/2004 - 8:53 AM Permalink
Luv2Fly

But since he has been rumored to have tried to dump his VP, I guess I can't wait to see it tonight.

That's Confidencefor ya.

Funny condsidering Kerry first wanted a Republican on his ticket as his first choice. Talk about confidence.

Tue, 10/05/2004 - 9:43 AM Permalink
jethro bodine

He frittered away a 90 percent approval rating. Just like I thought your kind is using that number that everyone knows is unrealistic. Your kind is filled with lies.  

Bush should be kicking ass.  He still might.

Tue, 10/05/2004 - 9:49 AM Permalink
jethro bodine

Can you say, Haliburton Who, Dick?

Do you think anyone but left wing extremists think twice about Haliburton?

Tue, 10/05/2004 - 9:50 AM Permalink
jethro bodine


But since he has been rumored to have tried to dump his VP, I guess I can't wait to see it tonight.

That's
Confidence
for ya.

Rumors put out by democrats and a few liberal republicans.

Tue, 10/05/2004 - 9:51 AM Permalink
Torpedo-8

Fold believes in a new rumor almost everyday.

Tue, 10/05/2004 - 5:41 PM Permalink
THX 1138



Rumors put out by democrats and a few liberal republicans.

Like the one that Powell was going to resign before the election?

The one that Cheney would not be Bush's running mate?

That Bush would pick a "Real Veteran" as a running mate?

That Rumsfield would quit?

Or the one where top Bush advisors would be found to have broken the law?

Or the one where we'd have much lower gas prices by now?

Or my favorite, about the recall of Arnold in California within six days of him taking office?

Fucking moron.


[Edited by on Oct 5, 2004 at 07:52pm.]

Tue, 10/05/2004 - 7:48 PM Permalink
THX 1138



KERRY: The time line that I've set out -- and again, I want to correct the president, because he's misled again this evening on what I've said. I didn't say I would bring troops out in six months.

What? I heard from a very reputable source (NOT), that Kerry would do it in four months?

Tue, 10/05/2004 - 7:51 PM Permalink