When Gary told me he had found Jesus, I thought, Ya-hoo! We're rich! But it turned out to be something different.
Byron White
I mean that neither of you may be happy until people forced to live by what you believe in.
Rat, your statement above shows just how much you misunderstand me. I am for democracy. I think the people should decide how they live. pieter and his ilk think they should decide and have it forced on people through their liberal allies on the federal courts.
What do you care what I understand? You claim to know what society wants. What does it matter what we think? We're just ilkto you. Subhuman, probably.
I say you ought to step it up. We don't deserve respect or consideration from you. Only more of the same. You claim to know what society wants.
You might be the most eloquent spokesperson for conservatism on this board. You say what other conservatives only say when they're drunk or mad enough.
I think the people should decide how they live. pieter and his ilk think they should decide and have it forced on people through their liberal allies on the federal courts.
Nonesense. Liberals want courts to keep people from forcing their views on them.
Stuff like making beating up people he considers to be either sinners or subhuman illegal, making religionchristianity optional rather than mandatory, and pregnancy likewise. Knowing that people are free to make their own moral choices makes him uncomfortable, diversity offends him, and he has a Constitutional right to be comfortable and unoffended.
Just when it seemed that every liberal commentator on the Terri Schiavo case was starting to sound like Barney Frank, the great Joan Didion published a long and remarkable article on the case in the quite far left New York Review of Books of June 9. Frank, of course, took the occasion of last week's Schiavo autopsy results as yet another opportunity to denounce Republicans as “this fanatical party willing to impose its own views on people.” For those of you still somehow unaware, “imposing their views” is a semiofficial Democratic meme or code phrase meaning “religious people who vote their moral views and disagree with us.”
as a matter of fact, fuck that... I'll talk to you whenever I fucking feel like it.
you had your chance and you couldn't stop talking to and about me, so now I'll say whatever the fuck I like to you. No more simply quoting you to point out the hypocrisy of you talking to me while claiming not to want me to talk to you.
Torpedo, you are one huge dumbass pimple on the ass of everyone here. Your only possible use could be that you are so damn stupid, you make even dumbasses like Ice and Von seem merely dim by comparison.
In all the time I've read your grade school taunts, not once have I seen anything come from you that even approached intelligent thought. It's truly pathetic.
The romanticizing of nature, let alone the ascribing of divinity to it, involves ignoring what really happens in nature. I doubt that those American schoolchildren who conducted a campaign on behalf of freeing a killer whale (the whale in the film "Free Willy") ever saw films of actual killer whale behavior. There are National Geographic videos that show, among other things, killer whales tossing a terrified baby seal back and forth before finally killing it. Perhaps American schoolchildren should see those films and then petition killer whales not to treat baby seals sadistically.
If you care about good and evil, you cannot worship nature. And since that is what God most cares about, nature worship is antithetical to Judeo-Christian values.
Nature surely reflects the divine. It is in no way divine. Only nature's Creator is.
So why did "god" create that amoral only-the-strong-survive system, yet tell his supposed son to teach us to set up a system that protects the less powerful?
Back in the day, magazines like Popular Mechanics would have classified ads that read "Receive interesting mail. 12 months/$2" and the like. Collections were taken to sign up unpopular teachers and classmates for as many of the mailing lists as could be found.
I mean that neither of you may be happy until people forced to live by what you believe in.
Rat, your statement above shows just how much you misunderstand me. I am for democracy. I think the people should decide how they live. pieter and his ilk think they should decide and have it forced on people through their liberal allies on the federal courts.
What do you care what I understand? You claim to know what society wants. What does it matter what we think? We're just ilkto you. Subhuman, probably.
I say you ought to step it up. We don't deserve respect or consideration from you. Only more of the same. You claim to know what society wants.
You might be the most eloquent spokesperson for conservatism on this board. You say what other conservatives only say when they're drunk or mad enough.
[Edited by on Jun 8, 2005 at 04:02pm.]
How long you going to go through this self pity?
Nonesense. Liberals want courts to keep people from forcing their views on them.
What "forcing" are you referring to?
Stuff like making beating up people he considers to be either sinners or subhuman illegal, making
religionchristianity optional rather than mandatory, and pregnancy likewise. Knowing that people are free to make their own moral choices makes him uncomfortable, diversity offends him, and he has a Constitutional right to be comfortable and unoffended.GTFU
[Edited by on Jun 8, 2005 at 09:42pm.]
I say you ought to step it up. We don't deserve respect or consideration from you. Only more of the same. You claim to know what society wants.
Yes. So what? You think the same thing. But I put my faith in the people deciding for themselves what laws they should live under. You don't.
Just when it seemed that every liberal commentator on the Terri Schiavo case was starting to sound like Barney Frank, the great Joan Didion published a long and remarkable article on the case in the quite far left New York Review of Books of June 9. Frank, of course, took the occasion of last week's Schiavo autopsy results as yet another opportunity to denounce Republicans as “this fanatical party willing to impose its own views on people.” For those of you still somehow unaware, “imposing their views” is a semiofficial Democratic meme or code phrase meaning “religious people who vote their moral views and disagree with us.”
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/johnleo/jl20050620.shtml
Just what Jesus meant...
eh, Jethro?
In Jesus's tiume there were the money changers. Today we have liberals.
In Jesus' time, Jesus was a radical liberal.
a violent revolutionary
Quit talking to me crabgrass...Torpedo-8.
how can I quit if you won't shut the fuck up?
as a matter of fact, fuck that... I'll talk to you whenever I fucking feel like it.
you had your chance and you couldn't stop talking to and about me, so now I'll say whatever the fuck I like to you. No more simply quoting you to point out the hypocrisy of you talking to me while claiming not to want me to talk to you.
Torpedo, you are one huge dumbass pimple on the ass of everyone here. Your only possible use could be that you are so damn stupid, you make even dumbasses like Ice and Von seem merely dim by comparison.
In all the time I've read your grade school taunts, not once have I seen anything come from you that even approached intelligent thought. It's truly pathetic.
Quit talking to me crabgrass...Torpedo-8.
"I'm a dumbfuck" - Torpedo-8
heh
It looks like the place will be going out with bang. I feared it would be a whimper.
The romanticizing of nature, let alone the ascribing of divinity to it, involves ignoring what really happens in nature. I doubt that those American schoolchildren who conducted a campaign on behalf of freeing a killer whale (the whale in the film "Free Willy") ever saw films of actual killer whale behavior. There are National Geographic videos that show, among other things, killer whales tossing a terrified baby seal back and forth before finally killing it. Perhaps American schoolchildren should see those films and then petition killer whales not to treat baby seals sadistically.
If you care about good and evil, you cannot worship nature. And since that is what God most cares about, nature worship is antithetical to Judeo-Christian values.
Nature surely reflects the divine. It is in no way divine. Only nature's Creator is.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/dp20050621.shtml
So why did "god" create that amoral only-the-strong-survive system, yet tell his supposed son to teach us to set up a system that protects the less powerful?
It is a test. You flunked.
Talk about non sequitur. If anybody has flunked that test it's "compassionate conservatives."
Compassionate conservatives pass with flying colors. It is people like you, that are out of touch with reality, that flunk.Â
I hate tests!
They make me testy, too.
Hey Pieter, have you made it to the new site?
You gonna straggle over there if/when this place shuts down?
Hey Pieter, have you made it to the new site?
what new site?
I've been to a few new sites, but I haven't seen you at any of 'em. You should still have my e-mail adddress . . .
You should still have my e-mail adddress . . .
Yeah, that reminds me. I've gotta go sign you up for some more spam.
:-)
You're just all over today aren't you Bill Fold?
You gonna follow me into the bathroom too?
poor fold.
Back in the day, magazines like Popular Mechanics would have classified ads that read "Receive interesting mail. 12 months/$2" and the like. Collections were taken to sign up unpopular teachers and classmates for as many of the mailing lists as could be found.