Skip to main content

Hosts Only

Submitted by CoolerCrewModerator on





Only Terry, ThoseMedallingKids, KITCH, Ares and Clue Master have access to this thread. 



 

Attachment:IdeaLightBulb.jpg



 

KITCH

he's not in yet...we still need to work on this...

and well...

its going to get hard for me on a weekend...
Fri, 11/11/2005 - 9:07 PM Permalink
Clue Master

Same here - We leave for Owattona tomorrow
Fri, 11/11/2005 - 9:16 PM Permalink
KITCH

FWIW..

THX has taken himself out of all "GOD" rights
Fri, 11/11/2005 - 9:22 PM Permalink
Clue Master

I don't blame him. Those of us in here are being judged for things we may or may not have voted on. It's a totally thankless job no matter how you look at it. All of this discussion and time put into this issue and no matter what the result, there would be hurt feelings and animosity towards us in here.

Just like you guys, I thought it was going to be as simple as having host powers to yank some idiot fucking around in the threads. We found out it's not that cut and dry. Especially when it involves 'regulars'. I want to start something for the crew and Nick because I don't want to wait until Monday.
Fri, 11/11/2005 - 10:09 PM Permalink
Clue Master

CC Mod: All of you have been aware of the ongoing issue concerning Wicked Nick, TMK and Cocorosie. Due to some information presented to us moderators from the AM forum sysop, we decided to revoke Nick's privilege to post in the CCRC discussion threads. After much debate and a majority vote, Nick has been allowed to post here once again. This vote was one that we as moderators never thought we would even be faced with being that it was way over the scope of what we each thought the 'position' entailed.

Some very strong viewpoints were conveyed and taken into account when coming to a conclusion in this matter.

edit away mods
Fri, 11/11/2005 - 10:28 PM Permalink
KITCH

looks good 2 me!!!

thanks for writing this up!!!
Sat, 11/12/2005 - 6:03 AM Permalink
OTiS

Thanks CM, Both for writing that and for putting into the words the crappy situation we ended up in.
Sat, 11/12/2005 - 6:36 AM Permalink
Terry

With my edits....

CC Mod:

Most of you have been aware of the ongoing issue concerning Wicked Nick, TMK and Cocorosie.

Due to some information presented to us moderators from the Able Minds forum sysop, we decided to revoke Nick's privilege to post in the Cooler Crew Refugee Camp discussion threads.

After much debate and a majority vote, Nick will be allowed to post here once again. (I would insert here whatever the stipulations are or will be for any continued privileges if that is what we plan to do – though now that this is public knowledge and not a more private situation, perhaps this would need to be decided by other users of these boards and not just moderators.)

This vote involved a type of situation in which we, as moderators, never thought we would need to be involved. It was way beyond the scope of what we each anticipated the position of moderator entailed.

Some very strong viewpoints were conveyed and taken into account when coming to a conclusion in this matter.
Sat, 11/12/2005 - 7:14 AM Permalink
ThoseMedallingKids

I guess I want to thank you guys for things. I know it's not a hard job. Of course it's not what we wanted. People know what's happened, and you guys are free to do whatever you want with that information. I could pursue this further, but it probably won't do any good just dragging it out. Nick's got to walk the straight and narrow. I still wish that he'd get the help that he needs. If he doesn't change then he'll have to pay the consequences. He's leaving us alone though, so as long as that happens, that's fine. I do strongly suggest that we work on a policy of what we find acceptable or not. I don't want this to happen again to anyone. I think we need to have this done somewhat quickly too, in preparation for the hunt.
Sat, 11/12/2005 - 7:57 AM Permalink
Clue Master

stipulations

Yup

suggest that we work on a policy

Yup

I'll have more time Monday. Off to Owatonna now.

 :smile:
Sat, 11/12/2005 - 11:38 AM Permalink
Clue Master

FWIW TMK - If the sysop was ever able to release the screen names that were all used from the same IP and that included Wicked Nick - I wouldn't hesitate for a second on yanking his privileges. Just my thoughts is all.
Sat, 11/12/2005 - 11:41 AM Permalink
ThoseMedallingKids

What do you mean? You're saying that if there is proof that Wicked Nick was posting/sending stuff from the same IP, you'd yank access? Isn't that what Tim said, that Nick was using other names to harass Coco?
Sat, 11/12/2005 - 5:36 PM Permalink
ThoseMedallingKids

I was looking at the access list to see if Nick had access yet. Two things I noticed while looking there. In the main threads, Redbear is listed as host/moderator power. I don't think that was supposed to be. But before I change it, I wanted to make sure there wasn't something I missed. Second, I looked at who has been banned. Excluding the name Wicked Nick, there are about 14-15 names on there max that are connected to things with Elissa and Nick.
Sat, 11/12/2005 - 7:49 PM Permalink
KITCH

umm...REDBEAR shouldn't be a host!!!!
Sat, 11/12/2005 - 10:36 PM Permalink
KITCH

thought I'd share this...as I'm looking today for a good TOS for this us.

Becoming a moderator is relatively easy, depending on what type of forum you are interested in and what your background can add to that forum. Being an effective moderator is a bit trickier. Anyone can become a moderator on the internet, after all there are more than enough forums to choose from. But once you are chosen, how do you proceed? Do you suddenly become a maniac with a delete button showing your personal distaste for members you may not care for? ItÂ’s not a power play, if thatÂ’s what you are looking for, your position will not be available to you very long.

So what is a moderatorÂ’s main purpose? Your main purpose is to support the forum you are associated with and quietly enforce the rules without turning into the Internet Police. Understand that whatever actions you take; be it deleting a post, or editing out unacceptable language, someone, somewhere is not going to like it. After all, do you like being censored?

Being consistent is the key to a good moderator. Learning to place your own likes and dislikes in the deep freeze while you are on the board, will help you find the flames easier. You may not like a certain member, but guess what? That member probably doesnÂ’t like you either. Engaging in a power play, singling out this certain member will eventually demean you in the eyes of the others on the team and on the boards. Your job is to keep the forums running smooth and even though you arenÂ’t getting paid for your time, you need to show up for work on a regular basis, otherwise others will have to pick up your slack, creating more work for them.

Being a moderator is a thankless job. You even give up your membership to a certain extent, once that decision is made to come on board with the Admin team. It doesn’t matter if you are the most popular member on the planet; once you cross over to that Mod Forum the other members place you on a different level than before when you were one of “them.” It’s sad, but that is just how it works out.

Your age will factor in as well, depending on which forum you are associated with. Most forum webmasters want their moderators to act maturely and use common sense, courtesy and diplomacy, which is not easy to do in some cases. Especially when that poster who makes you groan inwardly posts another inane thread about how “Tofu matters!”

Each forum comes with two separate rules of conduct, one for members, and one for moderators. You want to be sure you can follow these rules and that you are interested enough, or have enough knowledge behind you to want to try.

On the board where I have moderated on for several years our rules are simple:

1. Be a team player

2. Be fair-minded

3. Be diplomatic

4. DonÂ’t let personal issues get in the way of moderating

5. Show up when you can for the job.

I gotta admit...4 has been tricky lately.

Until recently, we had other rules such as, the ability to keep a thread active and interesting. But as the board grew in membership, and more threads had to be read (or at least skimmed) the decision was reached to nominate a non-mod team of people. Their duties would be to take over some of the basic moderatorÂ’s duties, including a Mentor Team to welcome new members, Community Leaders who can introduce fun new topics, and Specialists in the field of cat care that would be able to provide coherent and practical knowledge to threads requesting immediate help. Since this team has been implemented they have provided great assistance, allowing the moderators to keep their focus on other issues, such as troll patrol, handling complaints, moving posts, deleting unacceptable content. The team also provides more experienced eyes on the board to report posts headed for trouble. Also within the moderator team are Forum Admins. These are selected people that can do various tasks behind the scenes allowing the whole system to flow better.

I like this....we alrdy "kinda" do this ....

Once you join a moderating team, itÂ’s a good idea to ask questions. Take a quick look at the Moderators forum, going back a year or two and read the posts to learn how the team reacts, feels and responds. Make sure that you will be able to hold confidences because anything discussed behind the scenes should stay there. Also be sure and read the rules of the boards and familiarize yourself with them. If there is a moderator who has been on the board for quite awhile, contact that moderator and ask her for guidance.

Do I possess all the qualities I speak of above? No, I do not. These are characteristics that I have observed within the team I am fortunate enough to work with today. These qualities are what I strive for, and I have my own personal weaknesses and strengths among them. Part of what keeps me a strong moderator is the area of knowledge I am able to share with everyone. I have been told I am a good moderator. I strive to become more effective.

hmmm...looking back..ya we've made mistakes...but we are growing from them.
Sun, 11/13/2005 - 11:03 AM Permalink
KITCH

Maybe a good place to start..

By participating in the CoolerCrew folders and AbleMinds "live message service", you agree to the following Terms of Service of CoolerCrew folders:

• “Freedom of Speech”:

While we believe very much in the freedom of speech & expression, you DO NOT have an absolute right to say whatever you want in this community. Posts and comments that are meant to incite conflicts between members or outside parties are strictly prohibited. CoolerCrew Moderators have the absolute right to edit, modify, close or delete any content found in this community. While this rarely, if ever happens, we will not tolerate individuals or groups creating problems with the overall membership.

• Abuse / Flaming / Derogatory Comments:

Abusive Comments, Flaming, or derogatory insults or comments are strictly against the rules. If you disagree with another memberÂ’s point of view, do so in a mature and civil manner. If someone posts to discuss their personal problems or seeks help from other forums members, please do not respond unless you have something positive or helpful to add. If you find yourself being flamed or insulted by another member, please do not dignify that person with a response. Notify a moderator and let us handle it. If you feel you must respond to a flame or insult directly, please do NOT do so on the board. Use Private Messaging, but make sure you do NOT threaten any member.

• Language & Profanity:

While we understand the majority of members are grown adults, we do occasionally have young adults and children that visit CoolerCrew to communicate with others in similar circumstances as their own. Further, many people are offended by vulgar language. If you feel you must swear to get your point across, please consider censoring your language appropriately so as to not be overly offensive. (e.g., “S***!”) Replacing one or two letters in an expletive by using ASCII characters (! For I, etc) is not an acceptable solution.

  • Overly suggestive photographs/pictures posted in threads that Minors have access will most likely be considered adult material and removed.

    • Impersonating Members & Accessing other’s Accounts:

    You may not impersonate another board member or create an account for the purpose of provoking other users. This includes creating an account very similar to another member as to confuse others by the similarity in names. Accessing or using someone elseÂ’s account or attempting to access another memberÂ’s account is strictly prohibited.

    • User Accounts:

    A maximum of TWO accounts is allowed per person. If you are found to be using three or more accounts, one or more of them will be blocked and you may be banned from CoolerCrew all together depending on the situation. The bottom line here is to register one or two accounts and stick with it. If you are having issues with an account name please let a Moderators know as soon as possible.

    • Posting Personal Contact Information (Address / Phone Number):

    You may not post other CoolerCrew members personal contact information such as home address, work address, home telephone number, work telephone number, etc., in the public forums. ANYONE, including guests to CoolerCrew, can read the public forums - this policy is in place for your safety and protection.

    • Threats, Racism & Sexism:

    Threads or replies promoting or expressing intolerant views towards “minorities” (race, religion, sexual preference, interracial couples, etc.) will not be tolerated.

  • Sexual misconduct, sexual harassment, or harassment:

    It is the policy of CoolerCrew threads and folders that forms of unwelcomed sexual misconduct, sexual harassment, or harassment in any form will not be tolerated.

    • Deleting Posts and Closing Threads:

    CoolerCrew Moderators has the right to close or remove any post or thread we deem inappropriate.

    ...but still need to tweek. ...somehow I need to include "live messages" in this...
  • Sun, 11/13/2005 - 11:53 AM Permalink
    KITCH

    I know we shouldn't use "TERMS OF SERVICE" but need to find the right verbage...
    Sun, 11/13/2005 - 12:16 PM Permalink
    Terry

    How about Code of Conduct, Acceptable Use Policy, Terms of Use, or Rules of Conduct?
    Sun, 11/13/2005 - 1:53 PM Permalink
    KITCH

    going with the C theme

    I like Cooler Crew Code of Conduct.

    :ooh:
    Sun, 11/13/2005 - 1:54 PM Permalink
    ThoseMedallingKids

    Cooler Crew Community Code of Conduct
    Sun, 11/13/2005 - 1:55 PM Permalink
    Terry

    I found this...

    Although we reserve the right to edit Postings prior to their inclusion on the Services, as a general matter CMP does not screen or monitor such content. Therefore, you understand that you are solely responsible for all Postings and other materials, whether publicly posted or privately transmitted, that are uploaded, posted, emailed, transmitted or otherwise made available from your email address on our through the Services. You further agree that your Postings will not violate these TOS. Specifically, you represent and warrant that your Postings will not contain any material that:
  • is false, inaccurate, or misleading;
  • infringes any third party's copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret or other proprietary rights, or rights of publicity or privacy;
  • violates a nondisclosure agreement, or *violates any law or regulation (including, without limitation, those governing export control, unfair competition, or false advertising);
  • is defamatory, constitutes trade libel or product disparagement, or is unlawfully threatening or harassing;
  • is obscene or contains child pornography; or contains viruses, Trojan horses, time bombs, worms, cancelbots, easter eggs or other computer programming routines that may damage or interfere with the operation of any system, or unlawfully intercept any data or personal information.
  • Sun, 11/13/2005 - 1:57 PM Permalink
    KITCH

    I tried to leave out points such as copyright laws ...we kinda cut, copy, and paste alot during the hunt....didn't want to stop doing that...

    (its the posters fault then if they get caught...not mine)
    Sun, 11/13/2005 - 2:03 PM Permalink
    Terry

    I agree. I was just looking for other Conduct Codes and that one was specific to posting in a forum.

    I posted that more as a point of discussion and for making sure we thought of all we should be including - or not.
    Sun, 11/13/2005 - 2:06 PM Permalink
    Terry

    I found this for AIM products.

    Your Responsibility

    You are responsible for all activity made by you or anyone you allow to use your AIM account and Screen Name, including your family or friends. You agree to keep confidential the passwords associated with your account. You may not use AIM while driving, operating hazardous equipment, or engaging in other forms of hazardous activities. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless AOL for losses incurred by AOL or another party due to someone else using your account or password as a result of your failure to use reasonable care to keep your account information confidential or as a result of your failure to use reasonable care while using AIM Products. You are responsible for any materials you post or make available on or through the AIM Products, including message board posts, chat participation and homepages.
    Sun, 11/13/2005 - 2:08 PM Permalink
    Terry

    I laughed when I read this part of that:

    You may not use AIM while driving, operating hazardous equipment, or engaging in other forms of hazardous activities.
    Sun, 11/13/2005 - 2:10 PM Permalink
    KITCH

    I like that you would agree to not hold us responsible for somebody elses actions...but that is near to impossible and well...

    if it ever did go to court...good luck taking from the poor. :smile:
    Sun, 11/13/2005 - 2:10 PM Permalink
    Terry

    This from CBS:

    RULES OF CONDUCT

    It is a condition of your use of the Bulletin Boards and this Site that you do not:

    Use any Bulletin Boards for any illegal purposes (or to solicit any illegal act);

    Restrict or inhibit any other user from using and enjoying the Bulletin Boards;

    Post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane or indecent information of any kind, including images and language;

    Post any message that solicits gambling or engage in any gambling activity;

    Transmit or upload any information, software or other material which violates or infringes upon the rights of others, including material which is an invasion of privacy or publicity rights or which is protected by copyright, trademark or other proprietary right, or derivative works with respect thereto, without first obtaining permission from the owner or right holder.

    Transmit or upload any information, software or other material which contains viruses, time bombs, trojan horses, cancelbots, worms or other harmful or deleterious components or devices;

    Post any defamatory, libelous, hateful, or harassing messages, information or material;

    Post, or transmit or in any way exploit any information, software or other material for commercial purposes or which contains advertising, promotion or marketing;

    Use the Services for the purposes of sending junk email, chain letters, duplicative or unsolicited messages or "spamming" or in connection with contests, surveys or pyramid schemes;

    Try to gain unauthorized access to the Services, other users' accounts, or computers connected to the Services though password mining or other means;

    Interfere with another user's use and enjoyment of the Services or any other individual's user and enjoyment of similar services;
    Sun, 11/13/2005 - 2:16 PM Permalink
    Terry

    From the Dallas News regarding their bulletin boards:

    Other Specifics About Interactive Areas. The SiteÂ’s bulletin boards, chat rooms and other such interactive areas were created to provide users with a forum to express their opinions and share their ideas and information. Given the nature of the Site and the volume of messages and postings, we use reasonable efforts to monitor the Site, yet cannot and do not monitor all of the material posted or transmitted by users and third party information providers. To protect your safety, please use your best judgment when using these forums. We particularly discourage divulging personal phone numbers and addresses or other information that can be used to identify or locate you. We reserve the right to delete, move or edit any communications at any time, for any reason or in its discretion, but have no obligation to review or remove any such content. When using the Site, you are prohibited from posting material that:

    (a) contains offensive, vulgar, profane, false, abusive, libelous, hateful, defamatory or obscene language;

    (b) contains fraudulent, deceptive, or misleading statements;

    (c) violates a copyright or trademark, or any other intellectual property right of another;

    (d) violates the privacy rights of any third party; or

    (e) violates any municipal, state or federal law, rule, regulation or ordinance, or attempts to encourage such violation.

    This list is not exhaustive. Therefore, we reserve the right to remove any content posted on the Site and/or terminate your access to the Site at any time for any reason.
    Sun, 11/13/2005 - 2:24 PM Permalink
    Terry

    Kitch, what you have there is super. I was just looking over some other Codes of Conduct or Terms of Service to see if there was different wording someone liked better and to be sure we weren't missing something we might want to include.
    Sun, 11/13/2005 - 2:25 PM Permalink
    Terry

    A couple points from Yahoo:

    a) upload, post or otherwise transmit any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;

    (b) harm minors in any way;

    (c) impersonate any person or entity, including, but not limited to, a Yahoo official, forum leader, guide or host, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity;

    stalk" or otherwise harass another;
    Sun, 11/13/2005 - 2:34 PM Permalink
    KITCH

    I think what I was looking for is more of a guideline vs. hard rules..

    I wanted it to be somewhat free like we have it now...

    its something I love about here.....its hard to be over the line.
    Sun, 11/13/2005 - 6:47 PM Permalink
    OTiS

    I think you are on the right track Kitch wanting to go that direction. Quite the pool of guidelines you have there.
    Sun, 11/13/2005 - 6:54 PM Permalink
    Terry

    Kitch, I agree. The list you have is fairly detailed as it is.

    I do think we should include language like this:

    This list is not exhaustive. Therefore, we reserve the right to remove any content posted on the Site and/or terminate your access to the Site at any time for any reason.

    I'm not sure I like "for any reason", but it would cover anything we haven't thought of or could happen.
    Sun, 11/13/2005 - 7:25 PM Permalink
    KITCH

    I agree with you terry...

    I don't like "any time -any reason"...I just don't want people to freak saying you can ban me because you don't like my shoes???

    I'm ok with this line...

    This list is not exhaustive. Therefore, we reserve the right to remove any content posted on the Site and change the code of conduct without notice.
    Sun, 11/13/2005 - 7:38 PM Permalink
    Terry

    I think that's better.
    Sun, 11/13/2005 - 7:42 PM Permalink
    KITCH

    Sent:

     4 min ago - 14 Nov 2005 7:08 am New

    From:

     THX 1138[2fc0f9e]

     To:

     KITCH

    Subj:

     You're gonna hate this

    But I think you moderators should create an "Ask the moderators" thread.

    It doesn't have to be RIGHT NOW, with all that's going on, but I think it should happen.

    See, I got shit from all sides when this Nick thing blew up. Wondering what was gonna happen, who was deciding, when we were deciding, who decided who the deciders (Moderators) were.....

    On the same note, we might want to consider having some sort of election of moderators.



    heh...he leaves us...and then gives me a list of things to work on :ooh:
    Mon, 11/14/2005 - 6:50 AM Permalink
    ThoseMedallingKids

    Actually, I was just talking with him about some things. Here are my thoughts. I personally don't like the idea of election of moderators. It's going to be about policking and favorites. What happened if the breakfast club became the moderators? There would be plenty of people who were unhappy. Plus, there's been enough debate and discussion about people's character. We know that people don't like certain people, or at least they aren't as friendly. This could lead to even more of this kind of thinking or behavior. We don't need that right now as a community. Plus there could be the debate about who votes. Is it fair to have a vote now, and if so, who can or can't vote? Would someone who is around for the hunt, like a Green, be upset because they couldn't vote and decide?

    In thinking about this and discussing about JT, here is what I feel. There has been discussion about who is moderator and how we came to be. But I think that if we come up with a code of conduct, that our jobs will be a lot easier. We'll have a set of guidelines to use in enforcing things. There won't be as much discussion because we'll actually be able to go to rule # whatever, show that it was broken, and act. Plus, beyond this whole incident, what was there really? During the hunt there's problems, yes. But outside of it, there has hardly been anything. I know that we're coming up with a code of conduct. What I think is that we open it up to the forum as a whole. We are a community, we should let the community help make the code of how we want things to be. If they set the guidelines as a whole, all we do is enforce them. If there's a larger issue, like the one we just had, we can certainly open that discussion up to the forum too as far as what people think should be done. But if the community decides on the standards, then we as moderators basically just enforce them, and don't have really as hard a job. Can people be upset with us as moderators if we're enforcing the rules and standards that the people set?
    Mon, 11/14/2005 - 7:22 AM Permalink
    KITCH

    thanks for posting that TMK....its exactly what my thoughts are...

    One of my thoughts with this "code of conduct" is its like the constitution...its a work in progress and can always be tweeked.

    The way I have it set up now isn't that bad...it just simply states play like your parents would be proud of you.....

    But...I wanted to write up something HERE that could be tweek first...then given to the rest of the crew...let them give us ideas on more tweeks and ideas...who knows maybe we missed something or have something to ruling.....

    beyond that...IMHO we need another female....

    also TMK is exactly right...

    Right now voting would be a nightmare....

    voting for one person would be o.k.

    but voting for all of us would be a disaster.

    when you look at the core group that THX picked with Terry's help its amazing it is the differnt views and groups...he did a good job.
    Mon, 11/14/2005 - 7:42 AM Permalink
    ThoseMedallingKids

    Yeah, we are a diverse group. We do bring our strengths. Unfortunately that's not something that was discussed or presented to people as a whole. Perhaps that can be done at some point.

    As far as a structured framework, I think we should be careful in how we present it. There may be some who take it as we've come up with something and want them to say it's okay. They may be take that a wrong way. I'm not sure. I think though that a separate thread needs to be made. Give some time for discussion. Have it up there for a while, so that people can go back to it to reference, so we know what's been discussed, people can see how we came about on things. Plus we could always later, at some point, bring up other things to discuss, add amendments, etc.
    Mon, 11/14/2005 - 8:06 AM Permalink
    ares

    I gotta admit...4 has been tricky lately.

    ya know, i really don't find it difficult. there are people with whom i don't necessarily get along, but that doesn't mean i can't be fair when dealing with them.
    Mon, 11/14/2005 - 8:31 AM Permalink
    ThoseMedallingKids

    Oh, I'm not sure. I just knew there was one there. Could be not open.
    Mon, 11/14/2005 - 2:36 PM Permalink
    KITCH

    they torn it down to make a big new one.

    on robert street they are build a homedepot 2.
    Mon, 11/14/2005 - 2:42 PM Permalink
    Terry

    There is NO way a vote for moderators would work. There are way too many people with issues against others - especially right now.

    I think once we have settled this issue, I would like to see another female join this group. I know me2 has been mentioned and I would concur with that.

    If anyone thinks or wishes me to bow out of this group, I would be fine with that too without any hurt feelings.

    Different people are here for different reasons. When we first came here, THX asked for my opinion on who would be good because he didn't want to do the moderating alone anymore. We chose people with different strengths, for various lengths of participating, for the different times that some of you can be here, and for various other reasons that I don't even remember anymore. I think we did a good job of getting people from across the spectrum.

    I can't be here during the day and often there may be things that need handling then. I can't be consistently here in the evenings either so there may be someone better suited. I think the sole reason I was asked to be here is for the history...but I don't need to be a moderator to provide that if asked.

    My opinion is that we should get the Code of Conduct finished and posted. If there is good reason, after others read it, to change some of the language or add something, that's fine.
    Mon, 11/14/2005 - 3:54 PM Permalink
    Clue Master

    I agree. I would think simple and to the point would work best and let the crew branch out from there if they want.

    Oh, and voting would be a nightmare indeed. The thing I don't think that people understand is that contrary to the way things have been handled in some of the threads 'out there', we have stayed civil and fair with each other in here ever since it's inception. Which does say a lot for yours and JT's choices of moderators Terry.
    Mon, 11/14/2005 - 4:17 PM Permalink
    KITCH

    I'm ok with ME2...

    she's always had a good voice of reason as far as I'm concerned...

    and TERRY I won't let you go..its bad enough that JT backed out.
    Mon, 11/14/2005 - 4:42 PM Permalink
    THX 1138

    ares, kitch, otis, tmk, cm, & terry have access to this thread
    Mon, 11/14/2005 - 6:53 PM Permalink
    OTiS

    It's up to you all on how you want to bring more MODs or changes Mods for that matter.
    Mon, 11/14/2005 - 6:53 PM Permalink
    OTiS

    I can only assume that the entire Crew only really cares about things staying fair.
    Mon, 11/14/2005 - 6:53 PM Permalink
    KITCH

    CM you gave me a heart attack!!!
    Mon, 11/14/2005 - 7:36 PM Permalink
    KITCH

    OTS..

    what did you do the the *cough* men's club thread..

  • cough*

    sorry terry...

    :wink: :wink:
  • Mon, 11/14/2005 - 7:37 PM Permalink