you'll believe any crazy ass conspiracy theory presented to you.
it's not a theory that Bush and his friends have been in business with the bin Laden family since back in GW's Arbusto days. GW was partners with Osama's brother. It's a fact.
"It's absolutely essential that eight weeks from today, on Nov. 2, we make the right choice, because if we make the wrong choice then the danger is that we'll get hit again and we'll be hit in a way that will be devastating from the standpoint of the United States," Cheney told supporters at a town-hall meeting Tuesday.
Vice President Cheney, in a newspaper interview published this morning, sought to clarify his much-criticized remarks earlier this week that the U.S. could "get hit again" if American voters make the wrong choice in the presidential election.
</NITF>
<NITF>"I did not say if Kerry is elected, we will be hit by a terrorist attack," Cheney told the Cincinnati Enquirer. "Whoever is elected president has to anticipate more attacks," he said.
</NITF>
"My point was the question before us is: will we have the most effective policy in place to deal with that threat?" Cheney said. "George Bush will pursue a more effective policy than John Kerry."
</NITF>
If Cheney wants to say: "death wll rain down on us if we're not reelected," it's outrageous, but fair.
"I did not say if Kerry is elected, we will be hit by a terrorist attack," Cheney told the Cincinnati Enquirer. "Whoever is elected president has to anticipate more attacks," he said."
I guess he could have been talking about Ralph Nader. Didn't consider that.
I haven't seen any retractions from those who accused Bush of knowing about 9-11 or accusing Bush of invading Iraq for oil. But hey it's an election year.
I haven't seen any retractions from those who accused Bush of knowing about 9-11 or accusing Bush of invading Iraq for oil.But hey it's an election year.
insight?
I thought it was sorta obvious.
I thought it was sorta obvious.
I could post similiar pictures with Carter, Reagan, Kennedy, Roosevelt, Johnson....
You're so gullible.
it's not a theory that Bush and his friends have been in business with the bin Laden family since back in GW's Arbusto days. GW was partners with Osama's brother. It's a fact.
That you can ignore the facts of all thier longtime business connections is what is gullible.
Yeah, and Osama was on the CIA payroll.
Wanna buy a bridge?
It's a fact.
Yea sending troops into Afghanistan was just a clever roose to help Bin Laden.
Crabby, Am I to be blamed for the actions of my sister?
My Father?
My Mother?
[Edited by on Oct 29, 2004 at 03:30pm.]
It's a fact.
It's a molestation of the truth.
It's the truth.
That you have been told that he's these people's enemy is the molestation.
It's the truth.
No, it's not. It's a twisted molestation with about a half ounce of "truth".
You should team up with Michael Moore.
That you have been told that he's these people's enemy is the molestation.
The entire Bin Laden family is supposed to be his enemy? That's fucking nuts.
[Edited by on Oct 29, 2004 at 03:36pm.]
The entire middle east is the enemy of the 'Crusading' chimpanzee in the White House.
The entire middle east is the enemy of the 'Crusading' chimpanzee in the White House.
Yeah, those poor terrorists were just sitting there minding their own business....
LOL
[Edited by on Oct 29, 2004 at 03:41pm.]
JT 10/29/04 3:41pm
Amazing isn't it.
Osma bin Laden isn't in league with Bush.
But a vote for John Kerry will unleash him.
That's what the president tells us.
On the scale of outrageous statements where does that one line up?
[Edited 2 times. Most recently by on Oct 29, 2004 at 04:13pm.]
Yes, it is.
That's what the president tells us.
Got a quote and a link for that ?
"It's absolutely essential that eight weeks from today, on Nov. 2, we make the right choice, because if we make the wrong choice then the danger is that we'll get hit again and we'll be hit in a way that will be devastating from the standpoint of the United States," Cheney told supporters at a town-hall meeting Tuesday.
No. But it doesn't make it any less accurate.
Crabs does, though,.
Nice try.
Vice President Cheney, in a newspaper interview published this morning, sought to clarify his much-criticized remarks earlier this week that the U.S. could "get hit again" if American voters make the wrong choice in the presidential election.
</NITF>
<NITF>"I did not say if Kerry is elected, we will be hit by a terrorist attack," Cheney told the Cincinnati Enquirer. "Whoever is elected president has to anticipate more attacks," he said.
</NITF>
"My point was the question before us is: will we have the most effective policy in place to deal with that threat?" Cheney said. "George Bush will pursue a more effective policy than John Kerry."
</NITF>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10760-2004Sep10.html
I guess it's o.k for Kerry to criticize Bush on terrorism but if the other side does it, it's outrageous.
Hey, it's all right. It's an election year.
If Cheney wants to say: "death wll rain down on us if we're not reelected," it's outrageous, but fair.
"I did not say if Kerry is elected, we will be hit by a terrorist attack," Cheney told the Cincinnati Enquirer. "Whoever is elected president has to anticipate more attacks," he said."
I guess he could have been talking about Ralph Nader. Didn't consider that.
[Edited by on Oct 29, 2004 at 04:54pm.]
I haven't seen any retractions from those who accused Bush of knowing about 9-11 or accusing Bush of invading Iraq for oil. But hey it's an election year.
don't vote for me.
But a vote for John Kerry will unleash him.
No, No, No.
Kerry's gonna hunt him down and kill him and all the other terrorists.
That's the warmongers most recent stance anyway.
I wonder how the peaceniks are gonna justify that vote in their minds.
[Edited by on Oct 29, 2004 at 08:55pm.]
it's not Bush
It's Senator John Kerry.
[Edited 2 times. Most recently by on Oct 29, 2004 at 09:19pm.]
crabgrass 10/29/04 8:59pm
Who will you be voting for, for Prez?
I won't be voting foranyone.
crabgrass 10/29/04 9:27pm
Either you will cast a vote or you won't.
Let me guess. You are gonna vote AGAINST someone.
you figured that out all by yourself?
Thanks for the new tag Crabs
[Edited by on Oct 29, 2004 at 11:58pm.]
it's not Bush
That's what many of us have been saying for months.
Hitler could run and the Lefty's would still vote for him, simply because it's not Dubya.
Hitler would be a Republican
That may be, but I wouldn't vote for him.
You would.
As long as it wasn't Dubya.
that's because you would actually have options.
think about that for a second.
you SUPPORT someone that you yourself admit others feel is worse than Hitler.
Who gives a fuck what others think?
"Quit talking to me crabgrass" - Torpedo-8
Like I said.
"Quit talking to me crabgrass" - Torpedo-8
I won't be voting FOR anyone - CG
Why is CG a felon?
because I'm not.
crabs is the only one here and IÂ don't even know what he is saying. Bliss!
your ignorance is, I'm sure.
you SUPPORT someone that you yourself admit others feel is worse than Hitler.
What the fruitcakes on the left feel is of little relevance. The truth is what matters.
Besides, I said YOU would vote for anyone, even Hitler, as long as it isn't Dubya.
and then...
obviously not the truth.
I think you would vote for ANYONE, as long as it wasn't Dubya.
so, according to you, what you think doesn't matter.
okay.
What's great about this election?
If Kerry is elected, the world won't end for me.
There's many on the Left that think it will if Dubya is re-elected.
Another thing is, Kerry's set himself up for a mighty fall.
Even if he does get elected, he'll be a one termer.
That won't give him much time to fuck things up.
Then maybe we'll have better candidates on both sides, and maybe we won't have this divide in our nation that we currently have.