Busted! Camping weekend in Two Harbors and I finally made it to 50 finds! (it only took me three years) I'm not going to set any records that way, am I?
So what kind of event should we have when CM hits 50?
50!! Wow!
Is that 50 found caches or 50 logged ones because that may be a long time and the latter may take quite a few years more to accomplish. I'm a bit behind I'd have to say. :-(
[Edited 3 times. Most recently by on Sep 8, 2004 at 02:23pm.]
Hehe CM, Since I've found most of the caches in the St. Paul area, I'd be happy to run along with someday, at least you'd be assured a 99% success rate.
It isn't so much of not finding any. I've always found them. The first one of yours was my longest look and only 2 time search. It's just hard getting out there and then logging it.
Actually it's worked out well for today's adventures, though I may be relying on it too closely, as there's no good way to organize my find notes... may have to do those by hand still.
For anybody going to this...
Watch out for the moose poop. Its really really sticky...
Â
oh and 1st to post joe.
dead ....
We're actually going to be up in Lutsen that weekend. I may have to check it out.
good luck
I saw you were out 'caching up north.
Busted! Camping weekend in Two Harbors and I finally made it to 50 finds! (it only took me three years) I'm not going to set any records that way, am I?
could be.....the slowest active geocacher...
I know of a much slower one ;-)
[Edited by on Sep 8, 2004 at 12:54pm.]
So what kind of event should we have when CM hits 50? ;)
I'd say one that makes him look like "Robert Ritchie"
Â
[Edited by on Sep 8, 2004 at 01:57pm.]
So what kind of event should we have when CM hits 50?
50!! Wow!
Is that 50 found caches or 50 logged ones because that may be a long time and the latter may take quite a few years more to accomplish. I'm a bit behind I'd have to say. :-(
[Edited 3 times. Most recently by on Sep 8, 2004 at 02:23pm.]
Hehe CM, Since I've found most of the caches in the St. Paul area, I'd be happy to run along with someday, at least you'd be assured a 99% success rate.
It isn't so much of not finding any. I've always found them. The first one of yours was my longest look and only 2 time search. It's just hard getting out there and then logging it.
[Edited by on Sep 8, 2004 at 03:21pm.]
Yeah I hear ya there. I'm working on going paperless now (using a palm pilot, found some tools that theoretically should speed things up for me).
good luck
Actually it's worked out well for today's adventures, though I may be relying on it too closely, as there's no good way to organize my find notes... may have to do those by hand still.