Senator Daniel Akaka (D-HI) has introduced a billcalled the Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act of 2005, S.147. Akaka wants to extend the government's policy of self-governance and self-determination to Native Hawaiians. He, and fellow Hawaiian Senator Inouye intend to do this by creating a race-based and racially separate government for Native Hawaiians. Under S. 147 Native Hawaiians would be under the federal Indian law system and would be designated as a "tribe." This new race-based government would have jurisdiction over 20 percent of Hawaii's citizens as well as 400,000 citizens nationwide.
This would be the first time in our nation's history that we have created an extra-constitutional race-based government out of a group of American citizens. Moreover, were this bill to become law, this new race-based government would be allowed to deny its constituents the protections afforded by the 1st, 5th and 14th Constitutional Amendments because they would not apply to the new "tribal government."
This bill will likely receive scheduled Senate floor time before the chamber leaves for its August recess. Proponents of the legislation have been forcefully advancing the bill for 6 years now and during the last appropriations cycle they were able to secure a deal with Senate Leadership to assure floor time before this August is over. This fight will be won or lost on the Senate floor and it is currently unclear where the votes are.
And you know, if the bill those Senators from Hawaii introduced is defeated, then how will any of the Native American Treaties stand up to legal scrutiny?
can you make any less sense? Those treaties have nothing to do with the pending bill.
The contrast between Cindy Sheehan and these fathers who lost sons in Somalia is clear. The moral authority of presidential critics is directly related to how politically useful they are to the liberal agenda. Clinton was roundly criticized at the time for his bumbling in Somalia. But the critics armed with moral authority went ignored for years.Â
You validate terrorism. Keep it up, crabs. You may even alienate the likes of pieter.You are no different then they are. Oh much different. You are one warped son-of-a-gun.
You hold the same opinion as the terrorists. No I don't.
your so-called "moral authority" is no different than the terrorists you claim are "evil". You don't know anything about what is moral. You are depraved.
Clearly, Jethro wants it both ways. ALL those who do not agree with him are "Morally Corrupt/Challenged/Twisted" whatever.
It is supposed to be a country where free speech is allowed. So I say what I think. But I don't kill others that disagree with me or advocate it. That is where your extremism confuses you.
In crabs world it is okay for the likes of Saddam to kill with impunity but if anyone tries to put a stop to it they are a terrorist. Well I usually don't do this but you deserve it: F You! You are one disturbed SOB.
In crabs world it is okay for the likes of Saddam to kill with impunity but if anyone tries to put a stop to it they are a terrorist
I don't think it's okay for anyone to kill anyone.
the thing is, the terrorist think they are killing to make us stop killing, just like you do. they think we are evil and kill people in other countries to advance our own interests. just like you think of them. no different.
Â
Senator Daniel Akaka (D-HI) has introduced a billcalled the Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act of 2005, S.147. Akaka wants to extend the government's policy of self-governance and self-determination to Native Hawaiians. He, and fellow Hawaiian Senator Inouye intend to do this by creating a race-based and racially separate government for Native Hawaiians. Under S. 147 Native Hawaiians would be under the federal Indian law system and would be designated as a "tribe." This new race-based government would have jurisdiction over 20 percent of Hawaii's citizens as well as 400,000 citizens nationwide.
This would be the first time in our nation's history that we have created an extra-constitutional race-based government out of a group of American citizens. Moreover, were this bill to become law, this new race-based government would be allowed to deny its constituents the protections afforded by the 1st, 5th and 14th Constitutional Amendments because they would not apply to the new "tribal government."
This bill will likely receive scheduled Senate floor time before the chamber leaves for its August recess. Proponents of the legislation have been forcefully advancing the bill for 6 years now and during the last appropriations cycle they were able to secure a deal with Senate Leadership to assure floor time before this August is over. This fight will be won or lost on the Senate floor and it is currently unclear where the votes are.
do the people we are fighting believe they are fighting evil people?
that's not an answer
do you think that the people we are fighting think we are evil?
it's a simple question.
The queen of non-answers demands an answer...TFF.
do you think that the people we are fighting think we are evil?
it's a simple question.
And you know, if the bill those Senators from Hawaii introduced is defeated, then how will
any
of the Native American Treaties stand up to legal scrutiny?
can you make any less sense? Those treaties have nothing to do with the pending bill.
that you think the people we are fighting are evil is relevant but that they think we are evil is irrelevant?
You have proven the point I was making.
You and your attitude validate terrorism.
You have proven the point I was making. No one can prove any point you make, crabs.
You and your attitude validate terrorism. See this kind of statement shows how warped you are. How can you be so utterly clueless?
You validate terrorism. You are no different then they are.
The contrast between Cindy Sheehan and these fathers who lost sons in Somalia is clear. The moral authority of presidential critics is directly related to how politically useful they are to the liberal agenda. Clinton was roundly criticized at the time for his bumbling in Somalia. But the critics armed with moral authority went ignored for years.Â
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/brentbozell/bb20050831.shtml
You validate terrorism. Keep it up, crabs. You may even alienate the likes of pieter.You are no different then they are. Oh much different. You are one warped son-of-a-gun.
you validate terrorism.
no different.
Just because I hold a differnt opinion I validate terrorism? I always thought you were intolerant but now there is absolute proof.
You hold the same opinion as the terrorists.
your so-called "moral authority" is no different than the terrorists you claim are "evil".
Same old crabweed. Americans are evil. blahblahblah
I'm not calling anyone evil. That's you and the terrorists who do that.
You hold the same opinion as the terrorists. No I don't.
your so-called "moral authority" is no different than the terrorists you claim are "evil". You don't know anything about what is moral. You are depraved.
Clearly, Jethro wants it both ways. ALL those who do not agree with him are "Morally
Corrupt/Challenged/Twisted"
whatever.
It is supposed to be a country where free speech is allowed. So I say what I think. But I don't kill others that disagree with me or advocate it. That is where your extremism confuses you.
of course you do. it's so obvious.
you look in the mirror and see evil instead of yourself.
of course you do. it's so obvious.
a lot of things are "obvious" to the mentally ill.
I know you are, but what am I?
explain how you are any different in your thinking from the terrorists.
of course, first you would have to actually explain what the terrorist thinking is instead of simply saying it's that they are "evil".
Because they think that your thinking is "evil" too.
explain how you are any different in your thinking from the terrorists.
Real simple, dimbulb, I don't advocate killing people and I don't kill. If that is not enough for you you are beyond help. Â
You supported the invasion of Iraq, but you don't advocate killing people? your taxes and your vote killed people. your denial prove my point.
how can you get close enough to the monitor to read it with you nose that long?
In crabs world it is okay for the likes of Saddam to kill with impunity but if anyone tries to put a stop to it they are a terrorist. Well I usually don't do this but you deserve it: F You! You are one disturbed SOB.
I don't think it's okay for anyone to kill anyone.
the thing is, the terrorist think they are killing to make us stop killing, just like you do. they think we are evil and kill people in other countries to advance our own interests. just like you think of them. no different.
That IS advocating the deaths of tens of millions of people, you
ignorant loser.