Skip to main content

Abortion debate

Submitted by THX 1138 on
Forums

Debate the abortion issue here.

jethro bodine

before you gain control of women's bodies again? You can keep spewing the lies, crabs, it doesn't change the facts. You can fool people if you want but do you really feel good about it? You probably would.

before they die in back alleys with coat hangers? The old false allegation. Keep perpetuating the lies, crabs. I know you revel in it.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 3:34 PM Permalink
crabgrass

You can keep spewing the lies, crabs, it doesn't change the facts.

I'm not the one advocating controlling what women do with their bodies.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 5:44 PM Permalink
Grandpa Dan Zachary

Nobody is talking about the woman's body, they are talking about the baby's body.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 6:06 PM Permalink
Grandpa Dan Zachary

Besides, they are nothing more than matter and energy, so don't worry about it.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 6:11 PM Permalink
crabgrass

Nobody is talking about the woman's body, they are talking about the baby's body.

same thing.

Besides, they are nothing more than matter and energy, so don't worry about it.

you're the ones worried about it. but don't worry, the magic man in the sky will take good care of the fetus anyway and put that bad woman in the lake of fire too!

and besides...matter and/or energy is EVERYTHING, not "nothing more"

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 6:27 PM Permalink
THX 1138



before you gain control of women's bodies again?

before they die in back alleys with coat hangers?

I crack up when I hear such drama.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 6:28 PM Permalink
Grandpa Dan Zachary

same thing.

Really? So my son is the same thing as my wife? (excuse me while I hurl at the thought of that).

and besides...matter and/or energy is EVERYTHING, not "nothing more"

LOL. It still shouldn't bother you any.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 6:58 PM Permalink
crabgrass

Really? So my son is the same thing as my wife?

until he was born, yes.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 6:59 PM Permalink
crabgrass

LOL. It still shouldn't bother you any.

it seems to bother you.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 7:00 PM Permalink
Grandpa Dan Zachary

until he was born, yes.

There is the whole problem with this debate. I believe that they are different people.

it seems to bother you.

Killing children does bother me.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 7:13 PM Permalink
crabgrass

I believe that they are different people.

so, he was born before he was born?

they were part of each other....they were connected physically. He had never been a separate organism until he was born.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 7:16 PM Permalink
crabgrass

Killing children does bother me.

it bothers everyone.

but does creating unwanted ones bother you?

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 7:20 PM Permalink
crabgrass

I believe that they are different people.

then make sure she wants it.

simple enough

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 7:26 PM Permalink
Grandpa Dan Zachary

then make sure she wants it.

That is to be decided before getting pregnant.

He had never been a separate organism until he was born.

B.S. There is another body, another heartbeat, another brain, etc.

Are Siamese twins one organism or two people connected?

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 7:34 PM Permalink
crabgrass

Are Siamese twins one organism or two people connected?

they are one organism.

you have two of a lot of things, that doesn't make you two organisms, does it?

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 7:45 PM Permalink
OT

The mother is the mother, the father is the father and the baby is a combination of the two. The mother and baby are separate organisms.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 7:47 PM Permalink
crabgrass

The mother and baby are not the same organism until the baby is born.

of course they are.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 7:58 PM Permalink
OT

Sorry, I changed my wording.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 7:59 PM Permalink
crabgrass

The mother and baby are separate organism.

when the baby is born, the cord is cut and the fetus becomes a separate organism.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:00 PM Permalink
crabgrass

the time when they are separate is before the fertilized egg attaches itself to the uterus....then they are a single organism until the fetus is born.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:03 PM Permalink
crabgrass

besides, the State doesn't recogize the fetus as anything until it's born and they give it a birthcertificate.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:04 PM Permalink
OT

I understand organism to mean any living species. An unborn baby has it's own heart, lungs, brain, circulation and excretion systems. Doesn't that make it an organism?

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:05 PM Permalink
crabgrass

can you take a tax credit for a fetus that hasn't been born yet?

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:06 PM Permalink
crabgrass

so...how much do you guys (people who incidentally will never be pregnant) actually work to prevent unwanted education? Do you demand that your schools provide better sex education? Do you advocate birth control? What are you doing about it besides wanting to make criminals out if people who are trying to make some very difficult decisions about their own bodies?

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:09 PM Permalink
OT

Maybe I misunderstood the topic. I thought you were discussing whether or not a fetus was a separate organism. I believe it is. You can't take a tax deduction for an African violet either and it's an organism.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:10 PM Permalink
crabgrass

You can't take a tax deduction for an African violet either and it's an organism.

but you CAN take one for a born child.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:11 PM Permalink
crabgrass

Maybe I misunderstood the topic

the topic is right up there at the top of the page, over THX's head

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:12 PM Permalink
OT

Well, sometimes you get off topic. I thought this organism discussion was a sub-topic. And I've admitted before, I really don't have any business in here.

Incidently, I am a woman and the mother of seven grown children, all of whom learned about sex and birth control from their parents. I am a strong advocate for sex education in schools for the young people who were not taught it at home. And I am also anti-abortion.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:16 PM Permalink
crabgrass

Incidently, I am a woman and the mother of seven grown children, all of whom learned about sex and birth control from their parents. I am a strong advocate for sex education in schools for the young people who were not taught it at home. And I am also anti-abortion.

well, at least your opinion carries some weight.

no one is "pro-abortion". It's a horrible thing for any woman to have to go through. I just don't hink it's anyone's business what they decide besides them and their doctor. I certainly don't think need to criminalize it. For what it's worth, I'm not "pro-amputation" either.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:22 PM Permalink
Grandpa Dan Zachary

they are one organism.

If twin "A" wants to get rid of twin "B", but "B" does not want to, which one do you listen to?

They are two different people who happen to be connected.

Do you demand that your schools provide better sex education? Do you advocate birth control?

Yes, abstinence especially.

Do you advocate birth control?

In a way that does not encourage immoral behavior and teaches that nothing is perfectly safe except abstinence.

What are you doing about it besides wanting to make criminals out if people who are trying to make some very difficult decisions about their own bodies?

I have talked with my daughter, niece and nephews about this before.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:26 PM Permalink
OT

I guess what I mean by anti-abortion is that I would never consider it an option for myself and would strongly discourage it as a choice for any of my family. And I don't force my opinion on others. But I am saddened that it has become a means of birth control.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:28 PM Permalink
crabgrass

Yes, abstinence especially.

that's real effective.... rolls eyes

In a way that does not encourage immoral behavior and teaches that nothing is perfectly safe except abstinence.

I understand that lesbianism is pretty safe and effective.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:30 PM Permalink
crabgrass

I guess what I mean by anti-abortion is that I would never consider it an option for myself and would strongly discourage it as a choice for any of my family. And I don't force my opinion on others. But I am saddened that it has become a means of birth control.

I agree with all this. (of course, being a man the "not an option for myself" deal is a given)

what do you think about cases where rape is involved?

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:31 PM Permalink
OT

Here's where I might get myself into trouble, but here goes. I believe that any child is a gift and that the child who is the result of a rape deserves a chance at life. However, I can understand why a woman who didn't feel the same as I could resent that child and then take out her anger on it. But there is the option of adoption in that case.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:36 PM Permalink
crabgrass

And I've admitted before, I really don't have any business in here.

hey oldtimer...you absolutely have as much business in here as anyone else.

and since you are a woman, I think you have more business discussing abortion than myself or any other male.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:38 PM Permalink
crabgrass

But there is the option of adoption in that case.

so, you think in cases where a rape results in a pregnancy, the birthing of a child is just a part of the rape?

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:40 PM Permalink
OT

Thank you for that. I come in here and read all of the discussions and feel out of my league... somewhat intimidated. I don't speak up very often.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:41 PM Permalink
OT

I think it's the result of that rape. But the result is still a potential human life.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:42 PM Permalink
crabgrass

I come in here and read all of the discussions and feel out of my league... somewhat intimidated. I don't speak up very often.

well, you have a better argument than any I've read so far.

I think it's the result of that rape. But the result is still a potential human life.

the result is also a woman having to live with that result for nine months.

It's a weird thought process that says you can kill a man for trying to rape you, but you can't kill the result if he succeeds.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:47 PM Permalink
OT

The resulting baby isn't guilty of anything.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:49 PM Permalink
crabgrass

The resulting baby isn't guilty of anything.

you mean besides having a rapist for a father?

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:57 PM Permalink
Grandpa Dan Zachary

that's real effective.... rolls eyes

You don't think abstinence is an effective form of birth control?

I understand that lesbianism is pretty safe and effective.

But is it moral?

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:58 PM Permalink
Grandpa Dan Zachary

you mean besides having a rapist for a father?

That is the babies fault how?

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 8:59 PM Permalink
crabgrass

That is the babies fault how?

well...let's blame the mother then!

But is it moral?

is what moral?

lesbianism?

it's none of my fucking business is what it is.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 9:04 PM Permalink
crabgrass

That is the babies fault how?

the father is the father and the baby is a combination of the two

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 9:07 PM Permalink
Grandpa Dan Zachary

well...let's blame the mother then!

You are a sick person.

it's none of my fucking business is what it is.

Then why did you bring it up?

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 9:07 PM Permalink
Grandpa Dan Zachary

the father is the father and the baby is a combination of the two

Like I said, you are a sick person if you think it is the fault of the baby or the mother. Maybe you really are a souless piece of matter and energy.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 9:08 PM Permalink
OT

That still doesn't make it the baby's fault. It just makes it what you said, a combination of the two. A human being with potential.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 9:10 PM Permalink
crabgrass

You are a sick person.

well, then forgive me, Christian

and wash my feet while you are at it.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 9:14 PM Permalink
Grandpa Dan Zachary

well, then forgive me, Christian

I am sure that you would be forgiven if you meant it. You need some serious help.

Tue, 03/09/2004 - 9:19 PM Permalink