For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and the measure you give will be the measure you get.
This clearly means that ones judgments should be just because you will be judged in like manner. Your "interpretation" crabs can only result in anarchy. Jesus did not advocate anarchy. He advocated following God's word.
I haven't asked you to submit to my will... nor would I. Yes you have. You ask all of society to submit to you and the hedonistic lefts will.
It's you who wants to make me submit to your will. No I want you to submit to the will of the people as set forth through the laws put into place by elected representatives.
what exactly do you think I want you to submit to? submission of society to your immorality. your immorality destroys lives and will destroy this country if given full rein. why? because your views possess no virtue.
what immorality are you referring to (be specific)?... I haven't done anything immoral to anyone, much less society.
my views hurt no one. I've never in my entire life so much as struck another human being... and many of my views have a great deal of virtue... not that my virtue or lack of it effects you in any way.
what immorality are you referring to (be specific)?... I haven't done anything immoral to anyone, much less society. Just about everything you support. There isn't enough time to list them all.
my views hurt no one. That's true if you keep them to yourself and they are not let loose on society. Â
By all accounts, the 400-page Barrett report is a bombshell, capable possibly of wiping out Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential prospects. At the very least, it would bring to public attention a scandal that would make the Valerie Plame affair vanish into comical insignificance.
 Democrats know this. Using provisions in the independent-counsel statute that permit people named in a report to review the allegations against them and file rebuttals, attorneys close to the Clintons have spent the better part of five years reviewing every jot and tittle of the charges arrayed against their clients and friends.
 This careful and continuous monitoring of the report explains why Sens. Byron Dorgan, Dick Durbin and John Kerry took the highly unusual step earlier this year of trying to slip into an Iraq-war spending bill an amendment to suppress every word of the Barrett report. (Every other independent counsel finding has been printed in its entirety, with the exception of small sections containing classified material.)
In Case You Missed It: Mort Kondracke On Democrats' "Disastrous Week" And "Defeatist" Rhetoric
From Fox News' "Special Report"
12/08/05
FOX NEWS' MORT KONDRACKE: I think this has been a disastrous week for the Democrats across the board. When they're not incoherent, then they're defeatist.... And then we have John Kerry who's back in the picture. Made another speech today, which basically said that George Bush is doing nothing except military operations in order to -- in order to fight Islamic terrorism, practically nothing. And he comes up with this agenda, which sounds exactly like the Bush agenda as though -- I mean, he pretends as though Bush is doing nothing to foster democracy around the world, somehow, Jordan and Bahrain and Qatar and other places -- Egypt -- are moving toward democracy, he says, as if it's on their own. And the Bush Administration has had nothing to do with pushing it.
actually, the phrase is originally "fuggin' ay". it first appeared in print in Norman Mailer's novel The Naked and the Dead.
the correct pronunciation is "fuckin' a", as heard in films like The Deer Hunter and more recently Office Space
your google search can't possibly be accurate since "fucking a" would also give results for things like "fucking a watermelon" or "fucking a lot"... etc.
Evesdropped on a few of the overseas military last week at a bar in a faraway location. Half a dozen or so men and women away from the base. They were drinking hard -- shot after shot of Jagermiester in the early evening -- when I finished working and stopped in for a beer. They were just leaving when I came back from dinner a few hours later.
Altercations were occuring outside the lobby of the hotel and a lot of shouting. Coulda been bad, but I think they all got back to base all right.
McCarthy's insurgency, the most luminous memory of many aging liberals, would today be impossible -- criminal, actually -- thanks to the recent "reform" most cherished by liberals, the McCain-Feingold campaign regulations. McCarthy's audacious challenge to an incumbent president was utterly dependent on large early contributions from five rich liberals. Â
SEDER: Listen, as far as the war on Christmas goes, I feel like we should be waging a war on Christmas. I mean, I believe that Christmas, it's almost proven that Christmas has nuclear weapons, can be an imminent threat to this country, that they have operative ties with terrorists and I believe that we should sacrifice thousands of American lives in pursuit of this war on Christmas. And hundreds of billions of dollars of taxpayer money.
PHILLIPS: Is it a war on Christmas, a war Christians, a war on over-political correctness or just a lot of people with way too much time on their hands?
SEDER: I would say probably, if I was to be serious about it, too much time on their hands, but I'd like to get back to the operational ties between Santa Claus and al Qaeda.
PHILLIPS: I don't think that exists. Bob? Help me out here.
SEDER: We have intelligence, we have intelligence.
PHILLIPS: You have intel. Where exactly does your intel come from?
SEDER: Well, we have tortured an elf and it's actually how we got the same information from Al Libbi. It's exactly the same way the Bush administration got this info about the operational ties between al Qaeda and Saddam.
This is another attempt by the Neo-Christian-Cons to take a worn-out subject, blow it out of all proportion and make it seem as though there is imminent danger to Democracy itself - and all of us, unless we accept one(Theirs) narrowly defined definition of what their Christmas traditions are, and should be for everyone else?No it is about taking on intolerant asses like you.
no I am not for it. If I were living in any state with medical marijuana I'd contact my representative. Or I would start an initiative, if available, to repeal it.
I thought you were for democracy?
as long as the people vote for it, the State is right to do it, right?
your representative? that would make use of your republic, right? not your democracy, right because the people voted for it and you don't want to accept what the people voted for.
and here I thought you were saying that if the people vote for it (democracy), that makes it right.
no I am not for it. If I were living in any state with medical marijuana I'd contact my representative. Or I would start an initiative, if available, to repeal it.
I thought you were for democracy? You are a f-ing idiot. What the hell do you think contacting your representative or starting an initiative is?
as long as the people vote for it, the State is right to do it, right? What the hell did I just right immediately above?
your representative? that would make use of your republic, right? You do know that we live in a democratic republic, don't you?not your democracy, right because the people voted for it and you don't want to accept what the people voted for. And people have a right to try to change the laws, don't they?
and here I thought you were saying that if the people vote for it (democracy), that makes it right. man, you are on dimwitted mf.
He has, many times. But if it isn't something he likes, then it doesn't count, and of course anyone who doesn't agree is morally bankrupt.
You lefties are stupid as hell. It is democratic to work within the legislative or initiative process to change the law. That is why you people are dangerous. You have no grasp of how the system is supposed to work.
All but two of the eleven states with medical-marijuana laws have passed them by initiative, because there aren't many legislators out there that will vote for something that can be used to beat them over the head at election time.
All but two of the eleven states with medical-marijuana laws have passed them by initiative, because there aren't many legislators out there that will vote for something that can be used to beat them over the head at election time.
Conclusion? jethro is "on dimwitted mf."
Your point is what, dumb s***? Two states did not use intiaitive. And it may be possible to use another initiative repeal a previous intiaitive. That is the democratic process. Back in your court you dimwitted mf.
That is a good start on Dorgan's road back to respectability. Yet there is another far more serious bit of funny business he has been involved in. He, along with several crafty Democrats, has been attempting to deny the public the contents of an Independent Counsel's report that is believed to contain evidence of serious corruption and misuse of the Internal Revenue Service and the Justice Department back in the Clinton Administration. In this cover-up the Democrats have had assistance from a few dubious Republicans. It is time to let the public see this report.
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The last remaining U.S. independent counsel, David Barrett, after spending $21 million over 10 years, on Jan. 12 finally will close down his investigation of former Housing Secretary Henry Cisneros' lying to FBI investigators about hush money paid to an ex-mistress. The political significance is that the Barrett report's shocking allegations of high-level corruption in the Internal Revenue Service and Justice Department are likely to be concealed from the public and from Congress.
I wonder how many Democrats are in IRAQ right now, in Uniform, and many of them losing their lives or health, in order to give that nation some level of Freedom?
The soldiers are doing a fine job for a good cause. Aparently they aren't making the issue political.
The only people I insult are lefty idiots like you, pieter and crabs. And your question was a stupid one. I said the soldiers, as is their duty, weren't making a political issue out of the war. It is you that disparage the soldiers efforts with your attacks on the war being illegal and unwinable. It is you and your ilk that say their efforts are in vain. Those soldiers that want to take up the political fight when they get home can. But until then their politics are off the table.
Please show me where I said EITHER of those things, because I never did.
What part of your accusations that the Iraq war is illegal and it is unwinable. don't you understand disparage their efforts?
However, I believe this war is not winable militarily, and I have said so for a long, long time, and when I have said such things it was not some sort of "Attack" it was some sort of OPINION.
Like I said you disparage the soldiers. You are saying the soldiers are incompetent.
Lastly, the Troops are BARRED from giving negative-opinions on their commanders or the conduct of the war, because of the UCMJ. So your contention that they are all solidly FOR the War is not only misinformed, it's pretty naive.
That is not what I said. Must you lie about everything? I said it was their duty not to be political. As I have seen many times in recent interviews with soldiers on the "Tube", they are now fighting mainly for their Buddies and their own Asses, so they can just get HOME. (JUST like during the later stages of the Vietnam War.)
Iraq is nothing like Vietnam. It should be apparent even to a moron like you.
Massachusetts Senator John Kerry says that if the Democrats retake the House of Representatives in 2006, there's a "solid case" for impeaching President Bush for misleading the country about pre-war intelligence on Iraq. Speaking at a holiday party for staffers who'd worked on his 2004 presidential campaign, Kerry said, "If we win back the house, I think we have a pretty solid case to bring articles of impeachment against this president."
The National Journal reports that Kerry quickly added, "Don't tell anyone I said that." Kerry's spokesman insists the Senator was joking and says his remarks drew a laugh from the crowd.
Kerry is an even bigger idiot than I thought he was. Thank God he isn't and never will be president.
my position is that the government... State or Federal, has no business telling a woman what to do about her body or her pregnancy or her health. Your position is you love Roe v. Wade and the hell with what anyone else believes or what the Constitution says. You are for the use of illegitimate power if you approve of the result.
Democratic leaders have distanced themselves from Democratic National chairman Howard Dean's claim that the war in Iraq is unwinnable, as has Dean himself. And a new FOX poll finds that a majority of Americans by 51 to 38 percent disagree, but that same polls found that a distinct majority of Democrats agree with what Dean originally said. Fifty-nine percent said they agree that "The idea we're going to win this war is... just plain wrong," compared with only 15 percent of Republicans and 44 percent of Independents.
I encourage everybody who lives in South Saint Paul to write to the city council about their/our retarded snow emergeny parking rules. They basically don't want you to park on the streets at any time during a "plowable" snowfall. ??*&%#@? This is a very vague and the term "plowable" leaves room for debate. And the open ended time lets them basically ticket you at will. And what are people without off street parking suppose to do?
This basically a money maker for the city because of the vagueness of the law. I once was ticketed at 2am for an overnight snowfall that added up to a whole inch. (Which melted by noon anyway).
I suggested that they go to an "odd-even" parking rule when there is plowable snow to make it fair for everyone.
For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and the measure you give will be the measure you get.
This clearly means that ones judgments should be just because you will be judged in like manner. Your "interpretation" crabs can only result in anarchy. Jesus did not advocate anarchy. He advocated following God's word.
Go ask your pastor if Jesus taught you to judge and hate people.
Go ask your pastor if Jesus taught you to judge and hate people.
He will not. But he will not say to submit to the will of the proponents of hedonism and evil, either.
I haven't asked you to submit to my will... nor would I.
It's you who wants to make me submit to your will.
'Bill - Fold' 12/9/05 8:31am
But why is that, THX?
I mean in all of Peoples Forum.
Duh!
So if you can see the reasons why, then WHY don't you try to make it better, and in doing so, attract those people back?
Fucking "A". I don't get paid for this! I don't have a marketing department or an advertising agency working for me!
I haven't asked you to submit to my will... nor would I. Yes you have. You ask all of society to submit to you and the hedonistic lefts will.
It's you who wants to make me submit to your will. No I want you to submit to the will of the people as set forth through the laws put into place by elected representatives.
So if you can see the reasons why, then WHY don't you try to make it better, and in doing so, attract those people back?
If you, fold, were to permanatly remove yourself from these boards they may come back.
what exactly do you think I want you to submit to?
I could care less what you do or don't do as long as it doesn't, as Jefferson put it, "break my leg or pick my pocket"
your will.
what exactly do you think I want you to submit to? submission of society to your immorality. your immorality destroys lives and will destroy this country if given full rein. why? because your views possess no virtue.
what immorality are you referring to (be specific)?... I haven't done anything immoral to anyone, much less society.
my views hurt no one. I've never in my entire life so much as struck another human being... and many of my views have a great deal of virtue... not that my virtue or lack of it effects you in any way.
what immorality are you referring to (be specific)?... I haven't done anything immoral to anyone, much less society. Just about everything you support. There isn't enough time to list them all.
my views hurt no one. That's true if you keep them to yourself and they are not let loose on society. Â
By all accounts, the 400-page Barrett report is a bombshell, capable possibly of wiping out Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential prospects. At the very least, it would bring to public attention a scandal that would make the Valerie Plame affair vanish into comical insignificance.
 Democrats know this. Using provisions in the independent-counsel statute that permit people named in a report to review the allegations against them and file rebuttals, attorneys close to the Clintons have spent the better part of five years reviewing every jot and tittle of the charges arrayed against their clients and friends.
 This careful and continuous monitoring of the report explains why Sens. Byron Dorgan, Dick Durbin and John Kerry took the highly unusual step earlier this year of trying to slip into an Iraq-war spending bill an amendment to suppress every word of the Barrett report. (Every other independent counsel finding has been printed in its entirety, with the exception of small sections containing classified material.)
http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/tonysnow/2005/12/09/178552.html
In Case You Missed It: Mort Kondracke On Democrats' "Disastrous Week" And "Defeatist" Rhetoric
From Fox News' "Special Report"
12/08/05
FOX NEWS' MORT KONDRACKE: I think this has been a disastrous week for the Democrats across the board. When they're not incoherent, then they're defeatist.... And then we have John Kerry who's back in the picture. Made another speech today, which basically said that George Bush is doing nothing except military operations in order to -- in order to fight Islamic terrorism, practically nothing. And he comes up with this agenda, which sounds exactly like the Bush agenda as though -- I mean, he pretends as though Bush is doing nothing to foster democracy around the world, somehow, Jordan and Bahrain and Qatar and other places -- Egypt -- are moving toward democracy, he says, as if it's on their own. And the Bush Administration has had nothing to do with pushing it.
You can have a lesson by watching:
http://www.booktv.org/General/index.asp?segID=6416&schedID=389
Â
Then you can apply what you have learned by watching the following:
http://www.booktv.org/General/index.asp?segID=6512&schedID=389
Â
that's what I thought... you can't name even one specific thing I've done to society to hurt anyone.
what are "let loose on society"?
Results 1 - 10 of about 3,010,000 for "Fucking "A". (0.45 seconds)
Results 1 - 10 of about 3,000,000 for "Fucking A". (0.09 seconds)
Results 1 - 10 of about 85,000 for "Fuck-in A". (0.06 seconds)
Results 1 - 10 of about 197,000 for "Fuckin A". (0.19 seconds)
actually, the phrase is originally "fuggin' ay". it first appeared in print in Norman Mailer's novel The Naked and the Dead.
the correct pronunciation is "fuckin' a", as heard in films like The Deer Hunter and more recently Office Space
your google search can't possibly be accurate since "fucking a" would also give results for things like "fucking a watermelon" or "fucking a lot"... etc.
How does a jarhead recite the alphabet?
Fuckin' A, fuckin' B . . .
I guess I'm not as much an expert at profanity as the rest of you.
:-)
"How does a jarhead recite the alphabet?"
Where's your respect for the troops?
Jarhead, indeed.
Evesdropped on a few of the overseas military last week at a bar in a faraway location. Half a dozen or so men and women away from the base. They were drinking hard -- shot after shot of Jagermiester in the early evening -- when I finished working and stopped in for a beer. They were just leaving when I came back from dinner a few hours later.
Altercations were occuring outside the lobby of the hotel and a lot of shouting. Coulda been bad, but I think they all got back to base all right.
A Christmas quiz Â
http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/johnleo/2005/12/12/178651.html
That guy has stylish glasses.
So many of those TownHall columnists look like nerds.
All that said, it may turn out the Democrats have destroyed their team just as effectively as Owens destroyed the Philadelphia Eagles.
http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/jaybryant/2005/12/10/178586.html
But for those who want to read past the title, here are some case studies from “
The War on Christmas: How the Liberal Plot to Ban the Sacred Christian Holiday Is Worse Than You Thought
.”
http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/rebeccahagelin/2005/12/13/178826.html
McCarthy's insurgency, the most luminous memory of many aging liberals, would today be impossible -- criminal, actually -- thanks to the recent "reform" most cherished by liberals, the McCain-Feingold campaign regulations. McCarthy's audacious challenge to an incumbent president was utterly dependent on large early contributions from five rich liberals. Â
http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/georgewill/2005/12/13/178834.html
The Real Reasons For the War on Christmas That John Gibson Won't Tell You
Video clip available for download.
This is another attempt by the Neo-Christian-Cons to take a worn-out subject, blow it out of all proportion and make it seem as though there is imminent danger to Democracy itself - and all of us, unless we accept one(Theirs) narrowly defined definition of what
their
Christmas traditions are, and should be for everyone else?No it is about taking on intolerant asses like you.
as opposed to your oh-so-tolerant ass?
you are among the least tolerent people I've ever encountered.
as opposed to your oh-so-tolerant ass? I am quite tolerant of people that are not anti-democratic.
you are among the least tolerant people I've ever encountered. Since you are antidemocratic, you should think that I am intolerant of you.Â
I take it you are for at least eight States having legal medical marijuana, bodine.
I take it you are for at least eight States having legal medical marijuana, bodine.
I thought you were for democracy?
as long as the people vote for it, the State is right to do it, right?
your representative? that would make use of your republic, right? not your democracy, right because the people voted for it and you don't want to accept what the people voted for.
and here I thought you were saying that if the people vote for it (democracy), that makes it right.
I thought you were for democracy? You are a f-ing idiot. What the hell do you think contacting your representative or starting an initiative is?
as long as the people vote for it, the State is right to do it, right? What the hell did I just right immediately above?
your representative? that would make use of your republic, right? You do know that we live in a democratic republic, don't you?not your democracy, right because the people voted for it and you don't want to accept what the people voted for. And people have a right to try to change the laws, don't they?
and here I thought you were saying that if the people vote for it (democracy), that makes it right. man, you are on dimwitted mf.
He has, many times. But if it isn't something he likes, then it doesn't count, and of course anyone who doesn't agree is morally bankrupt.
You lefties are stupid as hell. It is democratic to work within the legislative or initiative process to change the law. That is why you people are dangerous. You have no grasp of how the system is supposed to work.
All but two of the eleven states with medical-marijuana laws have passed them by initiative, because there aren't many legislators out there that will vote for something that can be used to beat them over the head at election time.
Conclusion? jethro is "on dimwitted mf."
All but two of the eleven states with medical-marijuana laws have passed them by initiative, because there aren't many legislators out there that will vote for something that can be used to beat them over the head at election time.
Conclusion? jethro is "on dimwitted mf."
Your point is what, dumb s***? Two states did not use intiaitive. And it may be possible to use another initiative repeal a previous intiaitive. That is the democratic process. Back in your court you dimwitted mf.
That is a good start on Dorgan's road back to respectability. Yet there is another far more serious bit of funny business he has been involved in. He, along with several crafty Democrats, has been attempting to deny the public the contents of an Independent Counsel's report that is believed to contain evidence of serious corruption and misuse of the Internal Revenue Service and the Justice Department back in the Clinton Administration. In this cover-up the Democrats have had assistance from a few dubious Republicans. It is time to let the public see this report.
http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/emmetttyrrell/2005/12/15/179164.html
of course the democraps aren't interested in this scandal.
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The last remaining U.S. independent counsel, David Barrett, after spending $21 million over 10 years, on Jan. 12 finally will close down his investigation of former Housing Secretary Henry Cisneros' lying to FBI investigators about hush money paid to an ex-mistress. The political significance is that the Barrett report's shocking allegations of high-level corruption in the Internal Revenue Service and Justice Department are likely to be concealed from the public and from Congress.
http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/robertnovak/2005/12/15/179167.html
will any democrats want to know? or would they rather have hillary as president?
I wonder how many Democrats are in IRAQ
right now,
in Uniform, and many of them losing their lives or health, in order to give that nation some level of Freedom?
The soldiers are doing a fine job for a good cause. Aparently they aren't making the issue political.
Â
The only people I insult are lefty idiots like you, pieter and crabs. And your question was a stupid one. I said the soldiers, as is their duty, weren't making a political issue out of the war. It is you that disparage the soldiers efforts with your attacks on the war being illegal and unwinable. It is you and your ilk that say their efforts are in vain. Those soldiers that want to take up the political fight when they get home can. But until then their politics are off the table.
you wouldn't need to... the Feds would override the will of the people for you... and you wouldn't complain a bit.
why do you hate freedom so, bodine?
you wouldn't need to... the Feds would override the will of the people for you... and you wouldn't complain a bit.
why do you hate freedom so, bodine?
no I don't.
my position is that the government... State or Federal, has no business telling a woman what to do about her body or her pregnancy or her health.
Please show me where I said EITHER of those things, because I never did.
What part of your accusations that the Iraq war is illegal and it is unwinable. don't you understand disparage their efforts?
However, I believe this war is not winable
militarily,
and I have said so for a long, long time, and when I have said such things it was not some sort of "Attack" it was some sort of
OPINION.
Like I said you disparage the soldiers. You are saying the soldiers are incompetent.
Lastly, the Troops are BARRED from giving negative-opinions on their commanders or the conduct of the war, because of the UCMJ. So your contention that they are all solidly FOR the War is not only misinformed, it's pretty naive.
That is not what I said. Must you lie about everything? I said it was their duty not to be political.
As I have seen many times in recent interviews with soldiers on the "Tube", they are now fighting mainly for their Buddies and their own Asses, so they can just get HOME.
(JUST like during the later stages of the Vietnam War.)
Iraq is nothing like Vietnam. It should be apparent even to a moron like you.
Massachusetts Senator John Kerry says that if the Democrats retake the House of Representatives in 2006, there's a "solid case" for impeaching President Bush for misleading the country about pre-war intelligence on Iraq. Speaking at a holiday party for staffers who'd worked on his 2004 presidential campaign, Kerry said, "If we win back the house, I think we have a pretty solid case to bring articles of impeachment against this president."
The National Journal reports that Kerry quickly added, "Don't tell anyone I said that." Kerry's spokesman insists the Senator was joking and says his remarks drew a laugh from the crowd.
Kerry is an even bigger idiot than I thought he was. Thank God he isn't and never will be president.
no I don't. Yes you do you worthless liar.
my position is that the government... State or Federal, has no business telling a woman what to do about her body or her pregnancy or her health. Your position is you love Roe v. Wade and the hell with what anyone else believes or what the Constitution says. You are for the use of illegitimate power if you approve of the result.
Democratic leaders have distanced themselves from Democratic National chairman Howard Dean's claim that the war in Iraq is unwinnable, as has Dean himself. And a new FOX poll finds that a majority of Americans by 51 to 38 percent disagree, but that same polls found that a distinct majority of Democrats agree with what Dean originally said. Fifty-nine percent said they agree that "The idea we're going to win this war is... just plain wrong," compared with only 15 percent of Republicans and 44 percent of Independents.
This basically a money maker for the city because of the vagueness of the law. I once was ticketed at 2am for an overnight snowfall that added up to a whole inch. (Which melted by noon anyway).
I suggested that they go to an "odd-even" parking rule when there is plowable snow to make it fair for everyone.
The city's website is http://www.southstpaul.org
To email the city council
SSPOffice@southstpaul.org