I've seen Gibson's act, jethro. I've seen his horror stories shown to be untrue, and I've seen him keep telling them. No he is telling the truth. Why must you deny it?.
Now please, tell me, when retailers this year had their christmas merchandise on the shelves before halloween, when several radio stations in every major market are playing christmas carols 24/7 and have been since the first of the month, when christmas-related stuff is on exhibit everywhere, how can any person with two brain cells to rub together claim that there is a war being waged against christmas?Simple, stupid. They are taking the Christ out of Christmas. They don't want people to think about Christ. It is the result of lefties like you and your threats of filing law suits. It is creating an environment even for people that could not be sued to change their ways.Â
Driving through Sioux City today, we saw simple and elaborate displays of both secular and religious christmas symbols in yards, on houses and in stores and malls. There is no sign of IEDs or car bombs being used against such displays, and I haven't heard of such on the news. Where is this war? In the courts, ass.
But the simple fact is that you cannot quote even #1 Case in which you have represented anyone, let alone WON a case.
I could. You can find my name in the case reporters. You could find it on west law if you knew it.
But the point is I don't want people like you to know what it is.
Katrina, Scooter Libby, Tom DeLay, and Harriet Miers sent the national Democrats into paroxysms of joy. George Bush and the Republicans were history, as good as gone, dead meat.
Good news, Democrats. We've established that A) the Iraqis appear optimistic, B) our economy remains strong (even if you refuse to give a little credit to Bush's tax cuts), and C) our president is not a racist. Happy New Year.
We told you earlier that President Clinton had defended his executive authority to perform wiretaps and searches of American citizens without a warrant and in fact, in February of 1995, authorized the attorney general "to approve physical searches, without a court order, to acquire foreign intelligence information."
Now it turns out that presidents going back to Jimmy Carter have authorized such actions. An executive order signed by President Carter in May of 1979 reads, "The attorney general is authorized to approve electronic surveillance to acquire foreign intelligence information without a court order."
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Pat Roberts says he's "puzzled" by that letter the committee's senior Democrat sent the vice president in 2003, expressing concerns over the NSA's domestic surveillance program — since he never heard those concerns at the time.
West Virginia Senator Jay Rockefeller released the letter this week and in it, complained that security restrictions kept him from consulting with experts on the program, while arguing that it raised "profound oversight issues." But Roberts says he recalls that Rockefeller voiced his support to the vice president at the time and as recently as two weeks ago. He adds that Rockefeller is releasing the letter at a "politically advantageous" time... and says he finds the move "a bit disingenuous."
For the record, the stories in the book are true. I obtained the documents. I personally interviewed everybody involved except those people, like the ACLU, who refused to speak to me. I wrote every word in the book with my own ten fingers on my own keyboard.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Â
This is a smear campaign by the very people conducting the war on Christmas. It is the organization of the guy who appeared Wednesday which works so hard to ban Christmas in schools and libraries and public parks and city halls by declaring the Christmas tree and Santa to be religious symbols of Christianity when the Supreme Court itself says they are secular symbols which can be displayed anywhere, even on public property.Â
I'll withhold comment, because Gibson seems to say that no one can question him without reading his book. I think he was referring to the specific accusation that he was lying.
Nice way to sell books and shut down criticism.
Those folks at Fox can work all the angles. Dude, you ain't that far left. Are you aspiring to be?
Last week, the House of Representatives passed a resolution to protect the symbols and traditions of Christmas. The vote was 401-22 in favor of the resolution (5 voted "present"); below are the representatives that voted "nay."
15 ¶ Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
.16Â Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
.17Â Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. Â 18Â A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Â 19Â Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
.20Â Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them
and crabs says that Jesus said people should make no judgments.
and I am sure Jesus was thinking of the likes of crabs when He refferred to swine:
Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.
You used "resident busybody". I used "mama Rick". Have a chat with yourself. And while you're at it, use some of that PC wisdom on Fold. You want to be fair and balanced, right?
If that were true his feelings are warranted. He was trashed by your kind of people. He was well qualified for the job. Probably more qualified than anyone appointed in the last 100 years.
Bork has values... poor ones... ones that tell him to fire the guy investigating his boss, despite his boss being guilty of what he was being investigated for. This is know as having a lack of moral character. He deserved to be denied a seat on the Supreme Court after demonstrating his principles took a back seat to helping cover up his boss' crimes.
Bork has values... poor ones... ones that tell him to fire the guy investigating his boss, despite his boss being guilty of what he was being investigated for. He is great values, American values. Something that you do not understand.This is know as having a lack of moral character. He deserved to be denied a seat on the Supreme Court after demonstrating his principles took a back seat to helping cover up his boss' crimes. Doing the job that you were asked to do by your boss, the job you are being paid for, is a good thing. Bork broke no laws.
All I know is that he's a bitter, sanctimonious man, who seems to be nursing a helluva grudge. A grudge? Do you have something that you can point to that leads you to that dubious conclusion?
Every time I see him on television or read a column or hear him on the radio he's indignantly fretting about something. He sees the world going to hell in a hand basket. The reaction is reasonable.Â
I guess that's why they keep asking him back and telling him how brilliant he is. He is brilliant. He should be on the Court today.
He needs to go bowling once in awhile. Do you know that he doesn't?
WASHINGTON -- 'Tis the end of 2005 and time to look back. In politics what do I see? Well, I see the Republican party struggling against high seas. In the media the party is depicted as being in danger of losing to the Democrats in the off-year elections next fall. That probably will be the case, unless the Republicans have to run against the Democrats. Against the Democrats they could win with Warren Harding in the White House.
Nothing brings out racist slurs like an ambitious black man who doesn't know his "place." So when Maryland's lieutenant governor, Michael Steele, announced his candidacy for the US Senate recently, the bigots reared up. On one popular website, The News Blog, Steele's picture was grotesquely doctored, making him look like a minstrel-show caricature. "I's Simple Sambo and I's Running for the Big House," read the insulting headline accompanying the picture. Â Â Â Â This wasn't some white supremacist slime from the right-wing fringe. The News Blog is a liberal site, and the reason for its racist attack on Steele, a former chairman of the Maryland Republican Party, is that he is a conservative. Specifically, a black conservative. As far as too many liberals are concerned, blacks who reject liberalism deserve to be smeared as Sambos and worse.
If everyone here was doing nothing but eating potato chips and drinking beer all day on government money, it would still be none of your business.
And it's none of yours. But you can't see that. You keep sticking your nose in. Others can defend themselves. They don't need mama Rick.Â
I know it's none of my business if everyone here was doing nothing but eating potato chips and drinking beer all day on government money,
But You can't see that.
I've seen Gibson's act, jethro. I've seen his horror stories shown to be untrue, and I've seen him keep telling them. No he is telling the truth. Why must you deny it?.
Now please, tell me, when retailers this year had their christmas merchandise on the shelves before halloween, when several radio stations in every major market are playing christmas carols 24/7 and have been since the first of the month, when christmas-related stuff is on exhibit everywhere, how can any person with two brain cells to rub together claim that there is a war being waged against christmas?Simple, stupid. They are taking the Christ out of Christmas. They don't want people to think about Christ. It is the result of lefties like you and your threats of filing law suits. It is creating an environment even for people that could not be sued to change their ways.Â
Driving through Sioux City today, we saw simple and elaborate displays of both secular and religious christmas symbols in yards, on houses and in stores and malls. There is no sign of IEDs or car bombs being used against such displays, and I haven't heard of such on the news. Where is this war? In the courts, ass.
But the simple fact is that you cannot quote even #1 Case in which you have represented
anyone,
let alone WON a case.
I could. You can find my name in the case reporters. You could find it on west law if you knew it.
But the point is I don't want people like you to know what it is.
Yes Rick, you are the pinnacle of hypocrisy.
Â
Well well well...Ricky has moderator access. The squeaky liberal gets the grease.
I wouldn't dump you, torpedo, because I know how proud you would be. I wouldn't give you the satisfaction.
I knew he would put his personal feelings aside for what's right.
I respect Rick for that.
If people would just use the judgement and sense that God gave an adult, there wouldn't be any problems.
I gave Rick host access because I knew he wouldn't misuse it.
I knew he would put his personal feelings aside for what's right.
It is a test. Does he have the true lefty instinct to quash all dissent? Or does he still have a smidgen of reason? Time will tell!
Katrina, Scooter Libby, Tom DeLay, and Harriet Miers sent the national Democrats into paroxysms of joy. George Bush and the Republicans were history, as good as gone, dead meat.
http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/rossmackenzie/2005/12/22/180074.html
Good news, Democrats. We've established that A) the Iraqis appear optimistic, B) our economy remains strong (even if you refuse to give a little credit to Bush's tax cuts), and C) our president is not a racist. Happy New Year.
http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/larryelder/2005/12/22/180062.html
We told you earlier that President Clinton had defended his executive authority to perform wiretaps and searches of American citizens without a warrant and in fact, in February of 1995, authorized the attorney general "to approve physical searches, without a court order, to acquire foreign intelligence information."
Now it turns out that presidents going back to Jimmy Carter have authorized such actions. An executive order signed by President Carter in May of 1979 reads, "The attorney general is authorized to approve electronic surveillance to acquire foreign intelligence information without a court order."
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Pat Roberts says he's "puzzled" by that letter the committee's senior Democrat sent the vice president in 2003, expressing concerns over the NSA's domestic surveillance program — since he never heard those concerns at the time.
West Virginia Senator Jay Rockefeller released the letter this week and in it, complained that security restrictions kept him from consulting with experts on the program, while arguing that it raised "profound oversight issues." But Roberts says he recalls that Rockefeller voiced his support to the vice president at the time and as recently as two weeks ago. He adds that Rockefeller is releasing the letter at a "politically advantageous" time... and says he finds the move "a bit disingenuous."
Lastly, I think it is both Un-Christian and Un-American to have to be attacked,
daily,
by TORPEDO.
you do your share, fold. you deserve every attack that comes your way.
For the record, the stories in the book are true. I obtained the documents. I personally interviewed everybody involved except those people, like the ACLU, who refused to speak to me. I wrote every word in the book with my own ten fingers on my own keyboard.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Â
This is a smear campaign by the very people conducting the war on Christmas. It is the organization of the guy who appeared Wednesday which works so hard to ban Christmas in schools and libraries and public parks and city halls by declaring the Christmas tree and Santa to be religious symbols of Christianity when the Supreme Court itself says they are secular symbols which can be displayed anywhere, even on public property.Â
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,179560,00.html
I'll withhold comment, because Gibson seems to say that no one can question him without reading his book.
Nice way to sell books and shut down criticism.
Those folks at Fox can work all the angles.
Fold the victim, for the 217th time. I suppose it's society's fault you can't handle alcohol.
If he hasn't had a drink in that long, wouldn't that be evidence that he's handling it?
No
I'll withhold comment, because Gibson seems to say that no one can question him without reading his book. I think he was referring to the specific accusation that he was lying.
Nice way to sell books and shut down criticism.
Those folks at Fox can work all the angles. Dude, you ain't that far left. Are you aspiring to be?
Last week, the House of Representatives passed a resolution to protect the symbols and traditions of Christmas. The vote was 401-22 in favor of the resolution (5 voted "present"); below are the representatives that voted "nay."
http://www.billoreilly.com/blog#221686157760551481
we are at war and this is the best use of our Representatives' time?
hell, this is almost as bad as when they stopped what they were doing to rename french fires.
Matth
ew 7:
Jesus said:
15 ¶ Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
.16Â Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
.17Â Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
 19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
.20Â Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them
and crabs says that Jesus said people should make no judgments.
and I am sure Jesus was thinking of the likes of crabs when He refferred to swine:
Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.
Is crabs rending you?
bodine thinks I have somehow done him harm.
BTW bodine... I'm not in any clothing that you might consider a sheep. I am not disguising my thoughts here.
"Judge not lest ye be judge"
bodine thinks I have somehow done him harm.
No. But your "thinking" if allowed to reproduce in the populace will destroy it.
"Judge not lest ye be judge"
"For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and the measure you give will be the measure you get."
I would be happy to be judged by the same standards I judge you.
uh... huh?
Orwell invented a word for that. It was a major offense in Oceania. Thoughtcrime.
I love the smell of a Fold meltdown in the morning.
Hey dumbass, Rick accused you of the chips and beer thing, not me.
Your pathetic attempt to disguise yourself as Morti was laughable. Grade school, in fact.
The 217 was a guess. It's probably much greater than that.
You're a pure wackjob, Fold. I will continue to point that out.
Your fascination with me is troubling. Seek help.
"You accused me of eating chips and drinking beer, and I simply said I don't eat chips, don't drink, and haven't for many years."
I said that, but it wasn't about you, specifically, Bill.
I was talking to torpedo, the resident busybody when I said:
"If everyone here was doing nothing but eating potato chips and drinking beer all day on government money, it would still be none of your business. "
Mama Rick to the rescue! You just can't help yourself, can you?
It's Chistmas, torpedo. Try a little decency.
You used "resident busybody". I used "mama Rick". Have a chat with yourself. And while you're at it, use some of that PC wisdom on Fold. You want to be fair and balanced, right?
Using "Torpedo" and "decency" in the same sentence. Fifteen yards, loss of down.
Using "pieter b" and "decency" in the same sentence. Ejected from the game.
Stealing smack in an obvious and transparent rubber/glue playground manner = barred for life.
You're right. Substitute intelligent for decency.
I suggest that you lefties read Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline by Robert Bork. He has you guys pegged.
Bork's a bitter man. He has everyone pegged.
Bork's a bitter man.
If that were true his feelings are warranted. He was trashed by your kind of people. He was well qualified for the job. Probably more qualified than anyone appointed in the last 100 years.
Bork has values... poor ones... ones that tell him to fire the guy investigating his boss, despite his boss being guilty of what he was being investigated for. This is know as having a lack of moral character. He deserved to be denied a seat on the Supreme Court after demonstrating his principles took a back seat to helping cover up his boss' crimes.
Not me, but some would.
All I know is that he's a bitter, sanctimonious man, who seems to be nursing a helluva grudge.
Every time I see him on television or read a column or hear him on the radio he's indignantly fretting about something.
I guess that's why they keep asking him back and telling him how brilliant he is.
He needs to stop brooding and go bowling once in awhile.
Bork has values... poor ones... ones that tell him to fire the guy investigating his boss, despite his boss being guilty of what he was being investigated for. He is great values, American values. Something that you do not understand.This is know as having a lack of moral character. He deserved to be denied a seat on the Supreme Court after demonstrating his principles took a back seat to helping cover up his boss' crimes. Doing the job that you were asked to do by your boss, the job you are being paid for, is a good thing. Bork broke no laws.
All I know is that he's a bitter, sanctimonious man, who seems to be nursing a helluva grudge. A grudge? Do you have something that you can point to that leads you to that dubious conclusion?
Every time I see him on television or read a column or hear him on the radio he's indignantly fretting about something. He sees the world going to hell in a hand basket. The reaction is reasonable.Â
I guess that's why they keep asking him back and telling him how brilliant he is. He is brilliant. He should be on the Court today.
He needs to go bowling once in awhile. Do you know that he doesn't?
"Do you have something that you can point to that leads you to that dubious conclusion?"
It's an observation, not a conclusion.
"Do you know that he doesn't?"
No way. Even if he was, a bowler he'd stop after he saw The Big Lebowski.
WASHINGTON -- 'Tis the end of 2005 and time to look back. In politics what do I see? Well, I see the Republican party struggling against high seas. In the media the party is depicted as being in danger of losing to the Democrats in the off-year elections next fall. That probably will be the case, unless the Republicans have to run against the Democrats. Against the Democrats they could win with Warren Harding in the White House.
http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/emmetttyrrell/2005/12/29/180614.html
Nothing brings out racist slurs like an ambitious black man who doesn't know his "place." So when Maryland's lieutenant governor, Michael Steele, announced his candidacy for the US Senate recently, the bigots reared up. On one popular website, The News Blog, Steele's picture was grotesquely doctored, making him look like a minstrel-show caricature. "I's Simple Sambo and I's Running for the Big House," read the insulting headline accompanying the picture.
Â
   This wasn't some white supremacist slime from the right-wing fringe. The News Blog is a liberal site, and the reason for its racist attack on Steele, a former chairman of the Maryland Republican Party, is that he is a conservative. Specifically, a black conservative. As far as too many liberals are concerned, blacks who reject liberalism deserve to be smeared as Sambos and worse.
http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/jeffjacoby/2005/12/29/180617.html