Skip to main content

2012 - Tony Schmidt Park

Submitted by ares on
2012 Clues 

So its back to the drawing board for next year 
to find a spot so deep and drear. 
Harder to reach all you whiners 
than those buried Chilean miners. 

Next year's clues will inspire dread 
requiring knowledge of languages dead, 
Higher math rocket science 
disbanding every hunters alliance. 

I take your leave. I bid adieu. 
I go in search of the perfect clue. 
Prepare to hike hard dig deep and delve. 
Will have a grand party in 2012.



 

KITCH

The newspaper said it still reserves the right to ban some of the co-hunters from future treasure hunts, which are held in conjunction with the St. Paul Winter Carnival.
Fri, 02/10/2012 - 8:50 PM Permalink
KITCH

The list of winners of the 2012 Pioneer Press Treasure Hunt got smaller Friday.

The newspaper removed the names of four of the five initial winners after one of them admitted to accessing the song version of clue No. 9 hours before it was posted to TwinCities.com.

That means Lange Wallgren of Osseo is the sole winner, earning a check for $5,000 for turning in the medallion and a set of published clues early Feb. 1. He found the treasure a few hours after the 11th clue in the 12-clue contest was released.

The other four hunters had teamed up with Wallgren an hour or two before he found the 2-inch plastic medallion in Tony Schmidt Regional Park in Arden Hills.

What Wallgren and three of the other four hunters didn't know, they have said, was that co-hunter Alex Valen had days before located the yet-to-be posted Clue No. 9 on the Pioneer Press website and shared it with others.

The newspaper does not know whether he was the only person who was able to access the clue. But because Valen and the three other hunters had been searching together before Wallgren's find, the paper decided to remove all four from the finders list.

The song version of the clue had been placed on a TwinCities.com server but had not been published on the website. Valen was able to access it by entering the correct, unpublished Internet address for the song.

Two days after Valen and the rest of the winners

had been introduced at a news conference, he admitted that he had accessed the clue early.

The four co-hunters had provided a registered Winter Carnival button, worth an extra $5,000 in prize money. That sum has been rescinded.

"Today's action was to maintain the integrity of the treasure hunt for the sake of the legions of hunters to whom this community tradition means so much. We regret that today's action was required," said Lori Swanson, director of marketing for the Pioneer Press.

The newspaper said it still reserves the right to ban some of the co-hunters from future treasure hunts, which are held in conjunction with the St. Paul Winter Carnival.

John Brewer can be reached at 651-228-2093
Fri, 02/10/2012 - 8:52 PM Permalink
Terry

This is the first time in the hunt history that this has happened. It's a sad day. I'm glad the Pioneer Press is taking this stand.
Fri, 02/10/2012 - 8:53 PM Permalink
Wabbit Hutch

I do wish the cooler crew wouldn't make a statement on the website. It certainly isn't the opinion of all of us. However, I have always considered myself an independent, not a part of the Crew.

Peace everyone. I hope there isn't a serious schism here. I have enjoyed so many of you. Don't enjoy having your fellow Coolers for lunch too much.
Fri, 02/10/2012 - 9:02 PM Permalink
ares

Wabbit the statement is there more for the edification of the crowd that thinks we're a bunch of cheaters because now, according to the pp anyway, one of us is and that makes us all in those eyes. Although I have edited out the part about the banishment because 1) the pp isn't entirely forthcoming on the matter and 2) it was their mistake initially that led to this; that file should never have been available on the site when it was.
Fri, 02/10/2012 - 9:33 PM Permalink
tim_the_hunter

You should take out any blanket statements about what the Cooler Crew thinks.
Fri, 02/10/2012 - 11:56 PM Permalink
KC0GRN

interesting development.. So.. this Alex Valen accessed clue 9 early.. Does anyone else think that wasn't all that much of an advantage anyways? The hunt still went to 11 clues, long after clue 9 was released, and obviously tons of hunters were already in the right park.

I guess I'm just speaking as a 3rd party viewer to the information. It seems to me the clues are so cryptic that accessing anything early other than the 11th or 12th clue wouldn't really give someone a big advantage. Although I'm sure every devoted hunter would argue that point.

I also don't understand why the press would publish such files before they are released, maybe they're assuming everyone will act honorably. It's certainly going to be a big story, talked about for a long time to come. Especially now that it's been made public.

I wonder if this will change either how the press distributes clues in the future and/or if they will decide to not include audio/video clues. They could certainly use this incident as a reason to stop those. I know the only reason they really include them anyways is to get more traffic to their website during the hunt (lets face it, text clues can travel along a lot of different communication channels, word of mouth, texting, email, facebook, 3rd party websites, forums, etc.). So that being the case, they'll try to keep including them. Hopefully they'll at least make those files inaccessible until the time they're supposed to be accessed, keep everyone honest.
Sat, 02/11/2012 - 12:37 AM Permalink
brasscat

OMG ....
Sat, 02/11/2012 - 12:39 AM Permalink
witchdoctor

The act of snooping on the PiPress server was unethical and inappropriate.

I'm glad he came forward and hopefully the issue can be a learning experience

for all of us. The hunt is a game. There are both written and unwritten rules

to be followed. Vince Lombardi was wrong.
Sat, 02/11/2012 - 2:06 AM Permalink
Grey Wolf

I think the bigger reason the songs, videos, etc. were added was to better promote the Hunt and get more people interested in hunting. Marketing and promoting interest in the Hunt is what they are trying to do. Afterall, clues in the first week pretty much have people scattered all over the place. It's that last weekend's set of clues that usually brings out crowds to one or two parks when more people have more time to get out. People out chopping snow. People out getting excited. Lots of hype. That's what they are trying to produce.

Hype sells newspapers........that's their core business.

So, how are they going to hype it next year?
Sat, 02/11/2012 - 3:49 AM Permalink
OT

Where is this statement published? I don't see it on the PP hunt site.
Sat, 02/11/2012 - 4:24 AM Permalink
OT

Thank you Ian
Sat, 02/11/2012 - 6:16 AM Permalink
ares

I'll take out a blanket statement when the pp puts one in about their web security. As long as they only thing the haters have is the pops story we're all guilty by association.
Sat, 02/11/2012 - 8:35 AM Permalink
Clue Master

Maybe I'm lacking the same 'integrity' that the paper is accusing Alex and the boys of not having. But I'll say that if I happen to walk past the PP building and clue 9 just happens to blow out from their dumpster out back, I can guarantee that I will not only open the paper but also use it how I see fit. They shouldn't get upset when someone walks through the door when they leave it wide open. It's cold out there for cripes sake.
Sat, 02/11/2012 - 1:57 PM Permalink
SNAKE88

Neck cheated 3 times now
Sat, 02/11/2012 - 2:33 PM Permalink
Clue Master

He cheated his way all through Battle Creek this hunt too! :angry:
Sat, 02/11/2012 - 5:23 PM Permalink
diggorius rex

I sense some hostility..
Sat, 02/11/2012 - 6:07 PM Permalink
Brassmonkey

I have to say, this whole thing is kind of depressing.

This could have been handled differently.

We are the most loyal and dedicated hunters for the press and now things seem to be in chaos.

Hopefully time will heal some wounds.
Sat, 02/11/2012 - 6:54 PM Permalink
Clue Master

I think all 4 of them should have their medallion shirts replaced with these! :eek: :wink:

Sat, 02/11/2012 - 7:28 PM Permalink
Terry

It is depressing. I certainly agree with that.
Sat, 02/11/2012 - 7:41 PM Permalink
KC0GRN

I'd give them this tshirt :wink:
Sat, 02/11/2012 - 7:58 PM Permalink
40below

This whole thing is lame. Why did they have ANY of the songs uploaded onto their servers early to start with? And then to not even protect them if they did have to upload them early for whatever reason? An eighth grader with basic knowledge of how the internet works could have figured that out... and also would have known how to PROTECT A FILE so it can't be accessed early.

So disappointing.

They need to stop with this nonsense and go back to strictly text clues.
Sat, 02/11/2012 - 8:33 PM Permalink
Clue Master

Hilarious Joel! :sillygrin:
Sun, 02/12/2012 - 9:07 AM Permalink
witchdoctor

We all know that poking and peeking around someone else's server is not ethical behavior.

Blaming the PiPress is like blaming the robbery victim for carrying money.

Sometimes our hubris gets the better of our judgement and things get off

the track. This is now water under the bridge. Let it go.
Sun, 02/12/2012 - 1:43 PM Permalink
ares

That's actually a really blurry line, wd. Someones trash bin is "public" and the coPs don't need a warrant to search it. So if something blows out of the pps trash is that shady too? I say not. Bottom line, this is security through obscurity and it isn't secure. Period. Information that should not be accessible should not be accessible and this was.
Sun, 02/12/2012 - 4:33 PM Permalink
Eags

With all the new gimmicks the paper has been trying the past few years (videos, songs, changes to how and where and when the clues are released), I thought that the link names were so obvious (and I'm not the most advance computer user), and if I'd had a few extra minutes, I probably would have been curious enough to try substituting some characters. If it is in the public domain, well, I guess I never dreamed they would have anything out there that they didn't intend to release, so why shouldn't someone look around and see if the paper was just trying to see who was smart enough to figure out their new game. I wouldn't necessarily have expected to see an unreleased clue either, just would have been trying to see if I could decipher what looked like it could have been either extra clues or just distractions. I wonder why they didn't use something like tiny URL to code their links. I am shaking my head that they were so naive as to put that stuff out there, unsecured, ahead of time. I can't even think of a reason they would possibly have done that.
Sun, 02/12/2012 - 5:00 PM Permalink
diggin4it

We are the puzzle solvers and we are the dreamers of dreams ... if you place it .. they will come
Sun, 02/12/2012 - 8:01 PM Permalink
Eags

Well, actually, I *can* think of a reason, but that would start a whole new conspiracy theory! :wink: :goofy:
Sun, 02/12/2012 - 8:05 PM Permalink
KC0GRN

If I were charged with posting the clue materials online, I might be very tempted to place a fake 12th clue file at the start of the hunt, make it just hard enough to get to that it would seem legit, but easy enough whomever tried would think it was the real deal. Then of course, I'd lead the persons to a spot in a park, and all that they'd find would be a sign saying "Fail".
Sun, 02/12/2012 - 9:01 PM Permalink
witchdoctor

Just because the door wasn't triple locked and covered by armed guards

doesn't give anyone the right to enter. It wasn't dumpster diving.

Any IT wonk knows when they are trespassing or coloring outside the lines.

The line is NOT blurry. It is bright red and very distinct.

This affair is between the PiPress and the perpetrator(s).
Mon, 02/13/2012 - 4:42 AM Permalink
Clue Master

All Alex is guilty of is telling Jake IMHO
Mon, 02/13/2012 - 6:53 AM Permalink
me2

thats a great shirt!
Mon, 02/13/2012 - 7:25 AM Permalink
me2

hahaaha no kidding!
Mon, 02/13/2012 - 7:25 AM Permalink
me2

no one was prying in to a server WD.

It's simple www (101).

it can easily be stumbled upon by ANYONE.

the www address was there to be seen by ANYONE that typed it in.

hmmm lets seeeeee..... I'm in a hurry and I am anxious.

I can't find the stupid audio clue because the WWW.twincities.com website is lame...so I have a audio clue open.... I change 1 number or letter in the http www address so I can find it and wahla! but ooops its NOT clue #8 like I thought it was, it's saying clue 9! WHY? because some idiot at the pp sent it out to the world wide web early! That makes it the PP's problem.
Mon, 02/13/2012 - 8:49 AM Permalink
witchdoctor

Everything you posted reveals a plan of action to search for and find

something unauthorized. My point exactly.



If I go to a house and the front door is locked and nobody answers

the bell, is it o.k. for me to walk around to the unlocked back door and enter?

While inside is it o.k. to help myself to any cash, raid the

fridge, or load the flat-screen into my truck?
Mon, 02/13/2012 - 8:58 AM Permalink
me2

Thats awesome!!!
Mon, 02/13/2012 - 8:59 AM Permalink
me2

  • But you do know that the person who 'stumbled' IN TO that front door contacted the owner of the door/house and told them to lock it?!
  • Mon, 02/13/2012 - 9:00 AM Permalink
    witchdoctor

    Nobody stumbled in.

    If I recall correctly, the original poster commented about searching the

    directories and having the ability to read files on levels not accessible to

    the other posters. He had no business doing that and he knows it.

    Loose lips again sank the ship.
    Mon, 02/13/2012 - 9:09 AM Permalink
    me2

    huh? where is that posted?

    Who is this "original poster"?

    The audio clue (that the Pioneer Press is commenting about) was available to ANYONE typing in its www address. No directories. It was accessible to you and me.
    Mon, 02/13/2012 - 9:47 AM Permalink
    KC0GRN

    Correct, no one had to authenticate themselves on a server to get the information. If they did that, there would definitely be more to answer for than simply seeing a clue early. They would probably be looking at criminal charges then. That would be considered "hacking".
    Mon, 02/13/2012 - 9:51 AM Permalink
    witchdoctor

    All I'm saying that it is unethical and inappropriate to cruise the

    PiPress server and obtain information not published. You can parse the "I didn't

    commit a crime" all you want. If there was nothing to answer for, why was the

    $5k returned?

    Start with message 2641.
    Mon, 02/13/2012 - 10:01 AM Permalink
    me2

    It wasn't returned.

    It just isn't being given.
    Mon, 02/13/2012 - 10:08 AM Permalink
    witchdoctor

    My mistake.

    Maybe I should have said t-shirts.
    Mon, 02/13/2012 - 10:28 AM Permalink
    Mad_Dach5und

    The audio clue found in advance was NOT released to the public; it was not listed accidentally on any public link, either. Alex WAS snooping. The PiPress were idiots for not disguising their URLs better, and maybe it wasn't breaking & entering - but just because you CAN peep in the windows doesn't mean you SHOULD.

    I agree if Alex had kept that to himself, all of this nonsense would not even exist.

    If you get the 12th clue early for whatever reason, please just keep it to yourself. (Just stand on top of the thing in the woods and make grandiose hand gestures until someone walks over and asks if you need medical help.)
    Mon, 02/13/2012 - 10:38 AM Permalink
    me2

    the money wasn't returned.

    It just isn't being given.

    nopeekingkluenine.mp3

    was designed by the pp AFTER they were informed by THE HUNTER that the audio clue had been discovered. No one was "peeking" with bad intentions - this is supposed to be a fun game and they were playing, The pp turned this in to a "rick roll joke" when they realized they needed to have their www's not so apparent.

    That "nopeekingkluenine.mp3 " in the www was found by just looking at the www when clicking on the link. Now if someone didn't have a "link", what would they do? hmmmmm type in what they thought was the way to get to the clue because of past clues. That's not being deceptive, that's doing your homework.

    You're funny Maddog
    Mon, 02/13/2012 - 10:48 AM Permalink
    ares

    no different than if someone had mis-typed the url to the clue 8 song in a text message and got the clue 9 one instead. bottom line, if the clue was not available to the public, then it shouldn't have been available to the public. just because there isn't a link somewhere doesn't mean its not available to the public.

    there are very easy ways of keeping the file "available" but secured from prying eyes.

    none were employed.
    Mon, 02/13/2012 - 10:50 AM Permalink
    KC0GRN

    Whatever the outcome is, I doubt anyone will be able to get information early next year.
    Mon, 02/13/2012 - 10:53 AM Permalink
    me2

    I for one was not directly told by the source if indeed he himself was 'snooping' or typed in the incorrect/correct url/www or maybe another reason of how he got there. Were you told directly by Alex that he was searching for the next clues? The article only refers to someone saying they accessed the clue NOT that they were being vindictive when it happened, just that it happened.
    Mon, 02/13/2012 - 11:03 AM Permalink